I don't care to control women in this way and especially in a society with child support. You create single moms, turn men into slaves and you still get whores. If you abolished child support in its entirety then perhaps you'd have a point and trying to control women then in this way might make sense.
Child support + no abortion is definition dysgenic because only the men with bad genetics have nothing to lose and knock women up while the highest quality men barely procreate.
I only have to look to our society over the last century to know we live in a highly dysgenic society. Yes, many quality men do not procreate because of child support whereas men without jobs, living on welfare, etc... and your low life types without ability to properly gauge risk/reward procreate in droves while the quality men weigh the risks and decide against it. The net impact has without a doubt been dysgenics for the last century.
Child support must be abolished if you want abortion but frankly let people abort, it's also eugenic. The most abortions per capita in the USA are by black people which just proves this point. You don't need to control women, you just need to stop taxing men, stop having men pay child support and stop discriminating against men with the Civil Rights Act and women will start behaving better. The ones that don't shouldn't be procreating anyhow.
Yes, many quality men do not procreate because of child support
This is patently false. Those men know they cannot maintain the type of woman they desire, they then voluntarily eliminate themselves from the genetic pool, which inherently makes them not quality men.
Child support must be abolished if you want abortion but frankly let people short, it's also eugenic. The most abortions per capita in the USA are by black people which just proves this point. You don't need to control women, you just need to stop taxing men, stop having men pay child support and stop discriminating against men with the Civil Rights Act and women will start behaving better. The ones that don't shouldn't be procreating anyhow.
You understand you’re complaining about the wrong thing. You don’t have to eliminate child support, you have to eliminate no fault divorce and tie procreation to marriage again. Funnily enough that’s how the nuclear family thrived.
Absolutely not. You're just enslaving men to women in this case. Eliminating child support motivates women to act in a manner that makes it so men want to keep them and it removes the motivation women have to leave men. 80% of divorces are initiated by the women which will come way down if child support is eliminated. Child support gives incentive to breakup families.
You're the one who doesn't understand how to fix the issue.
Women don't need to be controlled if no government is oppressing men and stealing men's resources to prop women up. Women will thus be controlled because they'll need men to help them. As long as we ensure it's individual men helping them instead of a monopolistic and oppressive government helping them by harming the individual man, then women's behavior will be controlled in their negotiation with man.
I don't care to control women in this way and especially in a society with child support. You create single moms, turn men into slaves and you still get whores. If you abolished child support in its entirety then perhaps you'd have a point and trying to control women then in this way might make sense.
Child support + no abortion is definition dysgenic because only the men with bad genetics have nothing to lose and knock women up while the highest quality men barely procreate.
If you think high quality men aren’t procreating because of child support I have a bridge to sell you.
I only have to look to our society over the last century to know we live in a highly dysgenic society. Yes, many quality men do not procreate because of child support whereas men without jobs, living on welfare, etc... and your low life types without ability to properly gauge risk/reward procreate in droves while the quality men weigh the risks and decide against it. The net impact has without a doubt been dysgenics for the last century.
Child support must be abolished if you want abortion but frankly let people abort, it's also eugenic. The most abortions per capita in the USA are by black people which just proves this point. You don't need to control women, you just need to stop taxing men, stop having men pay child support and stop discriminating against men with the Civil Rights Act and women will start behaving better. The ones that don't shouldn't be procreating anyhow.
This is patently false. Those men know they cannot maintain the type of woman they desire, they then voluntarily eliminate themselves from the genetic pool, which inherently makes them not quality men.
You understand you’re complaining about the wrong thing. You don’t have to eliminate child support, you have to eliminate no fault divorce and tie procreation to marriage again. Funnily enough that’s how the nuclear family thrived.
Absolutely not. You're just enslaving men to women in this case. Eliminating child support motivates women to act in a manner that makes it so men want to keep them and it removes the motivation women have to leave men. 80% of divorces are initiated by the women which will come way down if child support is eliminated. Child support gives incentive to breakup families.
You're the one who doesn't understand how to fix the issue.
Congratulations, you've forfeited civilization.
I hope you weren't attached to air conditioning or indoor plumbing.
Women don't need to be controlled if no government is oppressing men and stealing men's resources to prop women up. Women will thus be controlled because they'll need men to help them. As long as we ensure it's individual men helping them instead of a monopolistic and oppressive government helping them by harming the individual man, then women's behavior will be controlled in their negotiation with man.
Even after you achieve all that you still need to keep women under control.