It's an observation. I may say that Al Qaeda in Syria is a close US ally. That is not praise. I think both the US government and Al Qaeda are contemptible.
And whatever the hell "riding their dick" means.
Don't you for a moment consider that you're gone off the track when you're attacking Tucker Carlson of all people, in defense of war and absolute mayhem?
I can call out Tucker for cucking to a terrorist government just fine, and still oppose us playing in the sandbox.
Or do you think we should just have to agree with everyone 100% on everything, or 0%? I know you're not that retarded, but you're trying to prove me wrong here.
I can call out Tucker for cucking to a terrorist government
The 'terrorist government' that you yourself just called a US ally? Gosh man, of all the things to be concerned about, I'd be more concerned about the US coddling terrorist governments (in Syria, and in Qatar according to you), than about Tucker pointing that out.
Or do you think we should just have to agree with everyone 100% on everything, or 0%? I know you're not that retarded, but you're trying to prove me wrong here.
It's one thing to disagree. It's quite another to make highly personal attacks that elide the substance. I'm sure you know the difference, because you're quite often the target of the latter here, because you don't agree with the Hivemind on Israel.
Former: "You're wrong for reasons X and Y."
Latter: "You're riding Israeli dick Schlomo."
Tucker is riding the wave of anti-us sentiment, instead of doing something positive. He went off the rails when he said UFOs were actually demons working with the US gov.
Cucker: "Qatar is one of our greatest allies". Me: "Qatar is at best an ally of convienience". Clearly the same thing.
Actually, you said: "Qatar is, in real terms, an ally of convenience.". There's no "at best" there. Regardless, this minor nisquote doesn't even matter. If you actually watched the video, you'd realize that he was pointing out just how hypocritical people who try to attack him by associating him with Qatar.
You also did not answer why you are absolutely outraged about Tucker making the same sort of observation that you yourself make, because Qatar is a "terrorist state", while not being outraged that the Deep State is allied with what you call a "terrorist state", and Syria which is actually a terrorist state now.
And Cucker? Who here is cucking to the Deep State?
Tucker is riding the wave of anti-us sentiment
Have you tried not turning everything you touch into shit?
instead of doing something positive.
Like what? Installing terrorists as leaders of Syria?
He went off the rails when he said UFOs were actually demons working with the US gov.
It's an observation. I may say that Al Qaeda in Syria is a close US ally. That is not praise. I think both the US government and Al Qaeda are contemptible.
And whatever the hell "riding their dick" means.
Don't you for a moment consider that you're gone off the track when you're attacking Tucker Carlson of all people, in defense of war and absolute mayhem?
I can call out Tucker for cucking to a terrorist government just fine, and still oppose us playing in the sandbox.
Or do you think we should just have to agree with everyone 100% on everything, or 0%? I know you're not that retarded, but you're trying to prove me wrong here.
The 'terrorist government' that you yourself just called a US ally? Gosh man, of all the things to be concerned about, I'd be more concerned about the US coddling terrorist governments (in Syria, and in Qatar according to you), than about Tucker pointing that out.
It's one thing to disagree. It's quite another to make highly personal attacks that elide the substance. I'm sure you know the difference, because you're quite often the target of the latter here, because you don't agree with the Hivemind on Israel.
Former: "You're wrong for reasons X and Y."
Latter: "You're riding Israeli dick Schlomo."
Cucker: "Qatar is one of our greatest allies"
Me: "Qatar is at best an ally of convienience"
Clearly the same thing.
Tucker is riding the wave of anti-us sentiment, instead of doing something positive. He went off the rails when he said UFOs were actually demons working with the US gov.
Actually, you said: "Qatar is, in real terms, an ally of convenience.". There's no "at best" there. Regardless, this minor nisquote doesn't even matter. If you actually watched the video, you'd realize that he was pointing out just how hypocritical people who try to attack him by associating him with Qatar.
You also did not answer why you are absolutely outraged about Tucker making the same sort of observation that you yourself make, because Qatar is a "terrorist state", while not being outraged that the Deep State is allied with what you call a "terrorist state", and Syria which is actually a terrorist state now.
And Cucker? Who here is cucking to the Deep State?
Have you tried not turning everything you touch into shit?
Like what? Installing terrorists as leaders of Syria?
Why?