Anything could always be better. That’s not an argument. The qns is whether the packaging is fit for purpose, barring retards. And considering it’s one store in a global launch having this issues then it’s fine.
If there was mass reports of switch2s being received with cracked screens then I’d say they need to look at their packaging. But there isn’t
You’re simping pretty hard for Nintendo right now dude.
Packaging is part of the manufacturing design. There a million and one products out there that encounter failure edge cases. Are they all “packagings fault?” No probably not explicitly.
But that is part of the packaging design life cycle and companies should be cognizant and responsible for improving their packaging design based on failures in the field.
So it doesn’t matter whose fault it is. What matters is what Nintendo and GameStop do about it. And if one or both of them just says “not my fault” then fuck them.
Nah, i dont have a switch 2 nor am i going to buy it until it has more than just mario kart on it. I am pointing out the packaging is perfectly reasonable unlike people who think you should cater to every single retard encounter possibility, which is going to be impossible.
And im actually involved in packaging design for my firms exports so I understand that you cant solve retarded handling completely. In this case, i literally wouldnt even bother if i was nintendo to change packaging based on one stores failure
And gamestop has already admitted fault and stated they’ve confiscated staplers
Bruh.
Two things can be true at the same time.
The packaging could be better. The GameStop employee could be “not a dumbass”
But never, ever, underestimate the dumbass factor
Anything could always be better. That’s not an argument. The qns is whether the packaging is fit for purpose, barring retards. And considering it’s one store in a global launch having this issues then it’s fine.
If there was mass reports of switch2s being received with cracked screens then I’d say they need to look at their packaging. But there isn’t
You’re simping pretty hard for Nintendo right now dude.
Packaging is part of the manufacturing design. There a million and one products out there that encounter failure edge cases. Are they all “packagings fault?” No probably not explicitly.
But that is part of the packaging design life cycle and companies should be cognizant and responsible for improving their packaging design based on failures in the field.
So it doesn’t matter whose fault it is. What matters is what Nintendo and GameStop do about it. And if one or both of them just says “not my fault” then fuck them.
Nah, i dont have a switch 2 nor am i going to buy it until it has more than just mario kart on it. I am pointing out the packaging is perfectly reasonable unlike people who think you should cater to every single retard encounter possibility, which is going to be impossible.
And im actually involved in packaging design for my firms exports so I understand that you cant solve retarded handling completely. In this case, i literally wouldnt even bother if i was nintendo to change packaging based on one stores failure
And gamestop has already admitted fault and stated they’ve confiscated staplers