How many more stages before women are given the right have their boyfriends/husbands put to death for any or no reason? That's where we're headed if the feminists get their way (which they always do eventually), and I can already hear the danger hairs and simps saying you have nothing to worry about if you're a good partner.
Boyfriends / husbands / men-who-they-have-sex-with-once can already be forced into a state of indefinite financial servitude at a woman's whim, so why not?
I was thinking more about how many more examples before we stop pretending the old timey doctors were wrong for calling women medically hysterical all the time.
How many more stages before women are given the right have their boyfriends/husbands put to death for any or no reason? That's where we're headed if the feminists get their way (which they always do eventually), and I can already hear the danger hairs and simps saying you have nothing to worry about if you're a good partner.
Boyfriends / husbands / men-who-they-have-sex-with-once can already be forced into a state of indefinite financial servitude at a woman's whim, so why not?
You are already ostracized if in a public place you look at a woman in a way she disapproves of.
I was thinking more about how many more examples before we stop pretending the old timey doctors were wrong for calling women medically hysterical all the time.
"someone" are we banned from speaking Imps name now?