"We wuzzery" is the short form of "we wuz kangz," which is black people claiming that they were the ancestors of anyone that's ever done anything in history, such as Egyptians, Mozart, Israelites, the entire island of Briton, etc.
Lately I've noticed some right wingers on X trend into the wuzzery as well. For example, the claim that ancient Chinese emperors were white has been doing the rounds for at least a few months. This is based on remains called the Tarim mummies that were excavated in Xinjiang and exhibit red hair. So it seems there is some basis to this... until you look at a map and see that Xinjiang borders Kyrgyzstan in the northwest and wasn't even really part of China until recently. So we're talking about white mummies found near the Caucasus. Earthshattering.
The other claim, and probably weirder, is that Jesus was a white European. I understand the motivation behind it - Christian heritage is a significant factor in today's right wing, but due to present views of Jewish culture the idea that Jesus was ethnically Jewish sticks in people's craws. Also, this countersignals the infamous kangz idea that Jesus was black.
Unfortunately there is no evidence that Jesus was white in the European sense and the Biblical record in Matthew and Luke clearly states via genealogy that He was born to the tribe of Judah. ("Jew" means member of Judah.) Revelations also calls Jesus the "Lion of the Tribe of Judah." In terms of appearance, that would be something like the modern Lebanese.
I guess the lesson here is that even anonymous discourse can tilt away from the facts when under cultural and political pressures.
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15HbS6KkQk/facts/c
^from the archives
Edit - just realized some fag removed the post, here’s the direct link to the image:
https://i.imgflip.com/6citdj.jpg
That said, I do think the racial history of the world is far more interesting than the mainstream lets on - there’s a reason so many “primitive” groups worship/are mythically ruled by Whites (e.g. Indians with their Brahmin, South Americans with Quetzalcoatl, Persians with the Aryans, Greeks with the Hyperboreans, and so on) - I think that humanity has risen and fallen in the past, and I think that after such a cataclysm the “advanced” peoples are forced to settle amongst the “primitive” people, primarily for survival reasons
I'd say that's because Adam and Eve were close to what we would describe as white. Lol
So Adam and Eve (origin of all humanity, apparently) were white but you think Jesus, just a few dozen generations later, was definitely brown and people who say he was white have a weird claim? I don’t really get the logic
Also, there is an interesting link between whites spread around the globe, giants, and red hair, beyond just the Chinese and Egyptian mummies:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rf_inGOubEg&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
Levantine people, which would most resemble Jesus, have white skin, not brown. But they are not white Europeans like Germanics, Normans, etc.
Re: "a few dozen generations" there are 4,000 years separating Jesus' generation from Adam and Eve through Biblical chronology, plenty of time for humans to biodiversify.
Surely they have a common origin?
Idk, maybe, but going by the text there are only either 3 sets of 14 (Matthew) or 77 (Luke, and which we know to be a symbolic number likely not meant to be taken literally) - a far cry from the 200 one might assume mathematically - it seems like most of this “biodiversity” is relatively recent.
But fair enough, very little is clear cut in these conversations, and much that one takes for granted may just as readily be tossed aside as junk by another looking to speak on the subject. I think it’s an interesting subject so thanks for posting.
If the speaker believes humans were put into existence in their contemporary form, why would you think that things like genetic inheritance of physical traits would be a limitation for them?
My point is it isn’t totally clear what the speaker believes - he appears to argue simultaneously that the first humans were obviously white while their descendant was obviously not white, though he may just be saying, in response to my last comment, “the reason so many primitive groups mythologize/worship whites is because of Adam and Eve being white”, which isn’t super clear but atleast makes some sense and doesn’t (seemingly) invalidate his arguments in the OP