Some guy said DEI isn’t a problem but not caring about merit it the problem. He almost had a point but doesn’t realize it’s one or the other, you can’t hire the best of the best and also hire people because they aren’t straight and white.
They don't really believe it. They pretend to believe it so that they're one of the "good guys" according to the programming they've been watching all of their lives where niggers are always thoughtful, soft spoken and kind and not quick to anger, impulsive and more racist than they can possibly imagine.
It all serves to reinforce the idea that "racism" (a natural human tendency) is the worst possible thing in the world for white people (and no one else)
It is a deeply effective 60 year psyop on the founding stock of the west and the recipe for its destruction.
The position would make sense if there was genuine exclusion during the time period that the current workforce was working.
Basically say
Group A has 80% good workers and 20% bad ones.
Group B has 40% good workers and 60% bad ones.
If every company decided to exclude Group B entirely from interviews, eventually they would winnow through the bad workers in Group A so that the situation was.
Group A not looking for work: 95 percent good workers and 5 percent
Group A looking for work: 24% good workers and 76% bad.
Group B looking for work: 40% good workers and 60% bad.
(I actually did the back of napkin math based on ~ 83% satisfied employment in group A with 1000 workers, some round off error expected)
So it would actually make sense if one employer bucked it and preferentially hired from group B because when you only consider the available workers, they have a better percentage.
But there hasn't been true exclusion during the last 30 years, so it doesn't work that way.
Some guy said DEI isn’t a problem but not caring about merit it the problem. He almost had a point but doesn’t realize it’s one or the other, you can’t hire the best of the best and also hire people because they aren’t straight and white.
They really believe there is this significant untapped pool of black female videogame developpers companies ''cannot afford'' to not hire / train.
They don't really believe it. They pretend to believe it so that they're one of the "good guys" according to the programming they've been watching all of their lives where niggers are always thoughtful, soft spoken and kind and not quick to anger, impulsive and more racist than they can possibly imagine.
I'm pretty sure most of them don't even consider it that deeply.
It all serves to reinforce the idea that "racism" (a natural human tendency) is the worst possible thing in the world for white people (and no one else)
It is a deeply effective 60 year psyop on the founding stock of the west and the recipe for its destruction.
The position would make sense if there was genuine exclusion during the time period that the current workforce was working.
Basically say
Group A has 80% good workers and 20% bad ones.
Group B has 40% good workers and 60% bad ones.
If every company decided to exclude Group B entirely from interviews, eventually they would winnow through the bad workers in Group A so that the situation was.
Group A not looking for work: 95 percent good workers and 5 percent
Group A looking for work: 24% good workers and 76% bad.
Group B looking for work: 40% good workers and 60% bad.
(I actually did the back of napkin math based on ~ 83% satisfied employment in group A with 1000 workers, some round off error expected)
So it would actually make sense if one employer bucked it and preferentially hired from group B because when you only consider the available workers, they have a better percentage.
But there hasn't been true exclusion during the last 30 years, so it doesn't work that way.