Even simping for potato head will get you lectured because you dared say she
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Its now smug to respond to someone who responded to you. Got it.
Seems to me you ran out of counter arguments and are trying to pretend you still won.
It's smug to tell people there's something wrong with them for not knowing something you know, doubly so when it's a subject that people are honestly better off knowing nothing about. Do you have any clue how humiliated you would be, on a great many subjects, if everyone involved here actually shared their total knowledge? Especially if you're so deeply buried in pop culture that you can't even conceive of a person who doesn't know about it.
Did nothing of the sort. He postured that only terminally online people could possibly know this, and anyone who did is the reason why "touch grass" was invented.
And I offered that it was a far reaching bit of pop culture, using anecdotes and examples, outside just niche meme twitter feeds. Which apparently offended both him and you.
Here I am, fully admitting to not being knowledgeable on a subject and capitulating to someone's greater knowledge, literally today. Almost like I'm capable of admitting to being wrong or offbase, instead of getting pissy at someone for daring to say otherwise.
But solid try, rate it 4/10.
You literally contradicted yourself on this one sentence after the other, which I quoted in my first reply.
No, that was an additional example of a place that by definition we have all been to where it was talked about. I listed a bunch of them, that was just another that was superfluous if it bothers you so. Its called giving a range.
Its fine if you guys didn't know it, its not worth knowing, but acting like you are so above it for not is peak redditor "what kind of sportsball is this?!" behavior.