Original: https://kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/college-english-majors-cant-read
Archive: https://archive.is/qlL6u
95% or so of the tested English majors in Kansas state universities could not parse three leading paragraphs of Dickens Bleak House. First paragraph of same is below:
LONDON. Michaelmas term lately over, and the Lord Chancellor sitting in Lincoln’s Inn Hall. Implacable November weather. As much mud in the streets, as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborn Hill. Smoke lowering down from chimney-pots, making a soft black drizzle with flakes of soot in it as big as full-grown snowflakes—gone into mourning, one might imagine, for the death of the sun. Dogs, undistinguishable in mire. Horses, scarcely better; splashed to their very blinkers. Foot passengers, jostling one another’s umbrellas, in a general infection of ill-temper, and losing their foot-hold at street-corners, where tens of thousands of other foot passengers have been slipping and sliding since the day broke (if this day ever broke), adding new deposits to the crust upon crust of mud, sticking at those points tenaciously to the pavement, and accumulating at compound interest.
Breakdown of the readers in the study:
-
58% of students understood very little of the passages they read
-
38% could understand about half of the sentences
-
5% could understand all seven paragraphs
Money quote:
These problematic readers, which again comprise 58% of the English majors in the study, cannot differentiate between literal and figurative speech in literature. When they encounter unfamiliar vocabulary, they sometimes leap to fantastical conclusions about the meaning of a passage, as this participant who thinks the mention of “whiskers” refers not to a bearded man but to an animal.
These are the people who presume to morally lecture you online. Never forget it.
I think another thing about dickens that is lost on modern readers is the context of his writing. Take the passage above for example. It’s describing the state of utter filth, crowdedness, discomfort of the street, presumably in London during the Industrial Revolution. As a modern reader I have to extrapolate to create that image in my mind. Whereas readers at the time were living it. So for them, the prose and imagery is transposed right on top of their lived experience.
I’d liken it to writing a passage about the experience of walking through a mall in 90s if you’re a century removed from that reality, how weird would it sound to describe the experience of walking through a mall in prose?
Think of how fucking weird that passage sounds if you’ve never been to a mall? It how weird it would sound to somebody reading it in dickens day.