Everything on the internet is a lie. What exactly is your metric for archival and what dilo you ever think you'll do with it?
The metric is probably "it says things I agree with". That doesn't mean it's true. It's like the "6,000,000/number of ovens*hours" calculation. It's a lie, because the 6 million figure actually had nothing to do with cremations. Yet some people get really mad when you point that out. Wooden gas chamber doors? It was exactly one door in one camp that held no prisoners.
Some people recognize that these are lies but recognize their memetic potential: they aren't supposed to be taken seriously. However many others actually believe these are bulletproof arguments and completely true.
So would you actually have any way of knowing if your Dissident websites are also full of lies? Or would you unwittingly fall for them because you agree with it?
In either case, then what is the point of archival? You shouldn't need anything to archive. You should be comfortable just making shit up and claiming it's true, because everything on the internet is made up shit. Everybody makes up lies to support their opinions all the time.
So I don't need to archive shit. Everything ever written by anyone is a lie, so I'll just believe what I want. Anyone who wants sources for anything is a fag.
The last time someone linked me to a dissident website it was a "debunking the debunking of the protocols" and it was literally hundreds upon hundreds of pages of schizophrenic raving that made no sense and barely addressed anything. But people believed it because they wanted to.
The entire world has been completely fake for decades. Literally every dissident I met pretends they're a 6'7" yoked Aryan living on a 600 acre homestead with 14 homeschooled children and 88 million dollars in crypto.
It's a big lie. So what good does archiving lies do.
I don't care. Like who are you to me? Some anonymous weirdo, who might be a bot, with a bizarre paranoid obsession who thinks he'll conquer the world "some day" after someone else does it for him. Literally what the entire dissident right believes. "Someone should do something, who, me? I'm busy it's gotta be someone else."
The entire Internet is functionally a psyop and you haven't even figured that out. What chance do you actually think you have when you're that far behind the curve?
The dissident right hasn't achieved literally a single thing in decades, not a single politician even in a single seat in any country anywhere, and you think the priority should be archiving retarded articles written by high school dropouts whose only merit is lifting weights and ranting about seed oils, which they understand nothing about on any scientific level because they think science is jewish. Lol. Good luck with that.
Damn dude three whole paragraphs? The mind boggles at how a man could accomplish such a thing. It must've taken tens of hours to do that.
Lmao you guys always try to pretend you're the smartest fuckers in the room but then you write some retard rural redneck shit like this. That's precisely why you are not a threat and have zero power. Your revolution of subhuman IQ farmers and plumbers ain't happening. Most of you chumps do manual labor because you're barely more than modern peasants.
I feel like you're arguing against some fictitious adversary. You're arguing against things no one here is saying.
Archives existed before archive websites. I've basically "saved" numerous webpages I liked locally. You can also print them (physically, on paper). I have loads of software like CS5 before everything became subscription only so that heaven forbid I can still have certain tools if the web goes down or adobe goes under.
And even little apps like resizers, file converters, drivers, all come in handy.
I also don't get the vitriol. No one here attacked you, but you are going on a tear.
That has nothing to do with everyone in this little forum and this forum only, exclusively following this gay trend of posting everything behind some archive link.
Dude I don't give a shit if you want to print out the internet and store it in your potato cellar. I care that half the links on this forum are obfuscated behind a shitty "service" that just makes everything fucking annoying to use, forces me to negotiate with an annoying captcha half the time, takes ten times longer to load, all to read a single fucking tweet from @cumburglar69420
It's retarded and it's only this place that does it. And nobody can even explain it. The best explanation I got was a clownish belief that someday someone might want to find this article in its original state, yet by archiving it, it makes it functionally irretrievable.
It's retarded and it's only this place that does it. And nobody can even explain it.
It's to deny clicks and ad revenue to commie journalists. Or in twitter's case, it's to allow people who don't want to create an account to read the whole thread instead of just one linked post. Also, it can be used to get around paywalls.
Everything on the internet is a lie. What exactly is your metric for archival and what dilo you ever think you'll do with it?
The metric is probably "it says things I agree with". That doesn't mean it's true. It's like the "6,000,000/number of ovens*hours" calculation. It's a lie, because the 6 million figure actually had nothing to do with cremations. Yet some people get really mad when you point that out. Wooden gas chamber doors? It was exactly one door in one camp that held no prisoners.
Some people recognize that these are lies but recognize their memetic potential: they aren't supposed to be taken seriously. However many others actually believe these are bulletproof arguments and completely true.
So would you actually have any way of knowing if your Dissident websites are also full of lies? Or would you unwittingly fall for them because you agree with it?
In either case, then what is the point of archival? You shouldn't need anything to archive. You should be comfortable just making shit up and claiming it's true, because everything on the internet is made up shit. Everybody makes up lies to support their opinions all the time.
So I don't need to archive shit. Everything ever written by anyone is a lie, so I'll just believe what I want. Anyone who wants sources for anything is a fag.
The last time someone linked me to a dissident website it was a "debunking the debunking of the protocols" and it was literally hundreds upon hundreds of pages of schizophrenic raving that made no sense and barely addressed anything. But people believed it because they wanted to.
The entire world has been completely fake for decades. Literally every dissident I met pretends they're a 6'7" yoked Aryan living on a 600 acre homestead with 14 homeschooled children and 88 million dollars in crypto.
It's a big lie. So what good does archiving lies do.
I don't care. Like who are you to me? Some anonymous weirdo, who might be a bot, with a bizarre paranoid obsession who thinks he'll conquer the world "some day" after someone else does it for him. Literally what the entire dissident right believes. "Someone should do something, who, me? I'm busy it's gotta be someone else."
The entire Internet is functionally a psyop and you haven't even figured that out. What chance do you actually think you have when you're that far behind the curve?
The dissident right hasn't achieved literally a single thing in decades, not a single politician even in a single seat in any country anywhere, and you think the priority should be archiving retarded articles written by high school dropouts whose only merit is lifting weights and ranting about seed oils, which they understand nothing about on any scientific level because they think science is jewish. Lol. Good luck with that.
Guy wrote a single sentence, bro responds with 3 paragraphs explaining how much he doesn't care.
But don't mind me either, I'm just a bot. Beep boop.
Damn dude three whole paragraphs? The mind boggles at how a man could accomplish such a thing. It must've taken tens of hours to do that.
Lmao you guys always try to pretend you're the smartest fuckers in the room but then you write some retard rural redneck shit like this. That's precisely why you are not a threat and have zero power. Your revolution of subhuman IQ farmers and plumbers ain't happening. Most of you chumps do manual labor because you're barely more than modern peasants.
I feel like you're arguing against some fictitious adversary. You're arguing against things no one here is saying.
Archives existed before archive websites. I've basically "saved" numerous webpages I liked locally. You can also print them (physically, on paper). I have loads of software like CS5 before everything became subscription only so that heaven forbid I can still have certain tools if the web goes down or adobe goes under.
And even little apps like resizers, file converters, drivers, all come in handy.
I also don't get the vitriol. No one here attacked you, but you are going on a tear.
That has nothing to do with everyone in this little forum and this forum only, exclusively following this gay trend of posting everything behind some archive link.
Dude I don't give a shit if you want to print out the internet and store it in your potato cellar. I care that half the links on this forum are obfuscated behind a shitty "service" that just makes everything fucking annoying to use, forces me to negotiate with an annoying captcha half the time, takes ten times longer to load, all to read a single fucking tweet from @cumburglar69420
It's retarded and it's only this place that does it. And nobody can even explain it. The best explanation I got was a clownish belief that someday someone might want to find this article in its original state, yet by archiving it, it makes it functionally irretrievable.
It's to deny clicks and ad revenue to commie journalists. Or in twitter's case, it's to allow people who don't want to create an account to read the whole thread instead of just one linked post. Also, it can be used to get around paywalls.
Use Nitter or XCancel then.
As for "clicks", lmao. What you guys can't figure out an ad blocker? Do you think they're going to miss all seventeen "clicks" from this site?
I used to think your username was ironic