He's so weird to get a handle on. Even within the same interview.
On the one hand in this interview he goes off on how countries that can't exist without the USA propping them us shouldn't exist. Then Tucker interjects "like Israel?" and Walsh was all "no no no, I don't think Israel is propped up by the USA, they would be fine without us".
Then at the end of the same interview he's talking about the destruction of the family unit and how nobody wants to talk about it because if you do you have to start noticing who is encouraging that destruction. He puts "noticing" out there on repeat and always just barely stops short of explicitly saying who, in a way that's very reminiscent of JQers trying to stay in the lines, but without ever actually Qing any Js.
It's probably a cop out to avoid angering his masters, but I agree with him. I think that's the message we should be telling conservative philo-semite voters. Israel doesn't need us. They've grown into a first world economy, with a world class military, hosting many of their own defense contractors, and they run one of the most powerful and infamous global intelligence agencies. They have nuclear weapons, and they are willing to use the Sampson Option if they are threatened. Israel is not in any danger from its neighbors. It's time to cut them loose and let them take care of themselves, while we take care of our people.
But actually then it sounds like I agree more with Tucker and both Walsh's setup and answer don't make any sense.
He's so weird to get a handle on. Even within the same interview.
On the one hand in this interview he goes off on how countries that can't exist without the USA propping them us shouldn't exist. Then Tucker interjects "like Israel?" and Walsh was all "no no no, I don't think Israel is propped up by the USA, they would be fine without us".
Then at the end of the same interview he's talking about the destruction of the family unit and how nobody wants to talk about it because if you do you have to start noticing who is encouraging that destruction. He puts "noticing" out there on repeat and always just barely stops short of explicitly saying who, in a way that's very reminiscent of JQers trying to stay in the lines, but without ever actually Qing any Js.
It's probably a cop out to avoid angering his masters, but I agree with him. I think that's the message we should be telling conservative philo-semite voters. Israel doesn't need us. They've grown into a first world economy, with a world class military, hosting many of their own defense contractors, and they run one of the most powerful and infamous global intelligence agencies. They have nuclear weapons, and they are willing to use the Sampson Option if they are threatened. Israel is not in any danger from its neighbors. It's time to cut them loose and let them take care of themselves, while we take care of our people.
But actually then it sounds like I agree more with Tucker and both Walsh's setup and answer don't make any sense.