If that effect was as significant as you claim then many men would be dating 4s or below nowadays. Instead, they mostly choose not to date.
You’re conflating demand with supply. Men aren’t choosing not to date, the market is too volatile for them to date. Those 4s are chasing the top 20% just like the majority of women.
You're conflating the Hollywood push for black girls and goblins with actual mid chicks.
Onlyfans begs to differ, it’s flooded with mids and many of them make thousands or more because men who don’t date women throw money at women.
I don't know how you think the human race managed to reproduce if men don't find mid women attractive. That doesn't make any sense.
Desire and attraction are not the same thing. Men will fuck 2s if they get horny or bored enough.
You’re conflating demand with supply. Men aren’t choosing not to date, the market is too volatile for them to date. Those 4s are chasing the top 20% just like the majority of women.
So now you think 4s aren't dating men either? Then men should be dating 2s. But they're not doing that.
Onlyfans begs to differ, it’s flooded with mids and many of them make thousands or more because men who don’t date women throw money at women.
Desire and attraction are not the same thing. Men will fuck 2s if they get horny or bored enough.
You're conflating casual sex and reproductive sex. For most of human history, people have paired off and had babies together. Are you alleging that for most of those couples the man was not attracted to the woman?
So now you think 4s aren't good enough? Then men should be dating 2s. But they're not doing that.
Did you ever take an economics class? If a ps5 became 10k overnight would you buy it? If the only alternative was a permanently broken ps5 for 600, would you buy that?
You're conflating casual sex and reproductive sex. For most of human history, people have paired off and had babies together. Are you alleging that for most of those couples the man was not attracted to the woman?
Casual sex was reproductive sex for all of human existence until 60 years ago. Men were forced to marry women then knocked up, and yes, there are thousands upon thousands of cases where the man did not find the women attractive and eventually cheated on her.
Did you ever take an economics class? If a ps5 became 10k overnight would you buy it? If the only alternative was a permanently broken ps5 for 600, would you buy that?
Nobody would buy those things if the demand curve remains static. In this case, a static demand curve means that men still hold the same standards, proving my point.
Casual sex was reproductive sex for all of human existence until 60 years ago. Men were forced to marry women then knocked up, and yes, there are thousands upon thousands of cases where the man did not find the women attractive and eventually cheated on her.
Yeah OK, so according to you most men throughout history didn't find their wives attractive. Glad you finally admitted that assumption.
Nobody would buy those things if the demand curve remains static. In this case, a static demand curve means that men still hold the same standards, proving my point.
So marriage rates are the same? Birth rates are the same? The supply is not adjusting to meet demand, that is not the same as “demand remaining static” that is supply remaining static.
Yeah OK, so according to you most men throughout history didn't find their wives attractive. Glad you finally admitted that assumption.
Not most, just 25-31% which is the average rate of affairs for men. You seem to think every woman is a 4…
You’re conflating demand with supply. Men aren’t choosing not to date, the market is too volatile for them to date. Those 4s are chasing the top 20% just like the majority of women.
Onlyfans begs to differ, it’s flooded with mids and many of them make thousands or more because men who don’t date women throw money at women.
Desire and attraction are not the same thing. Men will fuck 2s if they get horny or bored enough.
So now you think 4s aren't dating men either? Then men should be dating 2s. But they're not doing that.
You're conflating casual sex and reproductive sex. For most of human history, people have paired off and had babies together. Are you alleging that for most of those couples the man was not attracted to the woman?
Did you ever take an economics class? If a ps5 became 10k overnight would you buy it? If the only alternative was a permanently broken ps5 for 600, would you buy that?
Casual sex was reproductive sex for all of human existence until 60 years ago. Men were forced to marry women then knocked up, and yes, there are thousands upon thousands of cases where the man did not find the women attractive and eventually cheated on her.
Nobody would buy those things if the demand curve remains static. In this case, a static demand curve means that men still hold the same standards, proving my point.
Yeah OK, so according to you most men throughout history didn't find their wives attractive. Glad you finally admitted that assumption.
So marriage rates are the same? Birth rates are the same? The supply is not adjusting to meet demand, that is not the same as “demand remaining static” that is supply remaining static.
Not most, just 25-31% which is the average rate of affairs for men. You seem to think every woman is a 4…