Nobody would buy those things if the demand curve remains static. In this case, a static demand curve means that men still hold the same standards, proving my point.
So marriage rates are the same? Birth rates are the same? The supply is not adjusting to meet demand, that is not the same as “demand remaining static” that is supply remaining static.
Yeah OK, so according to you most men throughout history didn't find their wives attractive. Glad you finally admitted that assumption.
Not most, just 25-31% which is the average rate of affairs for men. You seem to think every woman is a 4…
So marriage rates are the same? Birth rates are the same? The supply is not adjusting to meet demand, that is not the same as “demand remaining static” that is supply remaining static.
No, retard. The supply curve is women. When women start ignoring 80% of the population they are restricting themselves, shifting the supply curve way over to the left. This pushes the equilibrium to much higher price (most women out of reach) and much less quantity (fewer men are dating).
We are in this situation precisely because supply has not remained static.
Not most, just 25-31% which is the average rate of affairs for men. You seem to think every woman is a 4…
Most women are average, dude. Most women are mid. That's how bell curves work.
No, retard. The supply curve is women. When women start ignoring 80% of the population they are restricting themselves, shifting the supply curve way over to the left. This pushes the equilibrium to much higher price (most women out of reach) and much less quantity (fewer men are dating). We are in this situation precisely because supply has not remained static.
The supply curve has been static for at least 50+ years currently. The static cost has been what drove demand down because it was set too high in the 70s. Like I said, if a ps5 is 50k the demand will diminish over time because the price is static. Men walking away hasn’t lowered the price, so yes, women are indeed the static factor.
Most women are average, dude. Most women are mid. That's how bell curves work.
Yes, which makes 4s and below in what percentage range again?
The supply curve has been static for at least 50+ years currently. The static cost has been what drove demand down because it was set too high in the 70s. Like I said, if a ps5 is 50k the demand will diminish over time because the price is static. Men walking away hasn’t lowered the price, so yes, women are indeed the static factor.
You have no idea how supply and demand curves interact. If suppliers simply increase price, then the market will still settle back to the same equilibrium because nobody's buying their product.
Women have restricted their own supply. The number of available women on the market has plummeted.
Yes, which makes 4s and below in what percentage range again?
If 5 is the average woman, then 4s are well within 1 standard deviation. Very close to average.
You have no idea how supply and demand curves interact. If suppliers simply increase price, then the market will still settle back to the same equilibrium because nobody's buying their product.
False, you will see diminishing returns, but people will still buy the product, especially if the product is a monopoly.
Women have restricted their own supply. The number of available women on the market has plummeted.
Also false, there’s an over abundance of supply, if you can afford the cost.
If 5 is the average woman, then 4s are well within 1 standard deviation. Very close to average.
So marriage rates are the same? Birth rates are the same? The supply is not adjusting to meet demand, that is not the same as “demand remaining static” that is supply remaining static.
Not most, just 25-31% which is the average rate of affairs for men. You seem to think every woman is a 4…
No, retard. The supply curve is women. When women start ignoring 80% of the population they are restricting themselves, shifting the supply curve way over to the left. This pushes the equilibrium to much higher price (most women out of reach) and much less quantity (fewer men are dating).
We are in this situation precisely because supply has not remained static.
Most women are average, dude. Most women are mid. That's how bell curves work.
The supply curve has been static for at least 50+ years currently. The static cost has been what drove demand down because it was set too high in the 70s. Like I said, if a ps5 is 50k the demand will diminish over time because the price is static. Men walking away hasn’t lowered the price, so yes, women are indeed the static factor.
Yes, which makes 4s and below in what percentage range again?
You have no idea how supply and demand curves interact. If suppliers simply increase price, then the market will still settle back to the same equilibrium because nobody's buying their product.
Women have restricted their own supply. The number of available women on the market has plummeted.
If 5 is the average woman, then 4s are well within 1 standard deviation. Very close to average.
False, you will see diminishing returns, but people will still buy the product, especially if the product is a monopoly.
Also false, there’s an over abundance of supply, if you can afford the cost.
Which is again, not the majority