Saying "it's just a couple of small time outlets" literally ignores every part of our history and why we are here, as if you specifically are operating in bad faith, and wish to redefine why we did what we did.
The corruption in gaming journalism revealed by gamergate isn't unique to it but is endemic in journalism in general. So, why stop at pruning a few rotten branches, why not aim higher and try to topple the whole rotten tree?
TBH, destroying the BBC is not literally our fight. Kotaku and Polygon very much are.
This comment perfectly encapsulates you.
It literally doesn't.
Saying "it's just a couple of small time outlets" literally ignores every part of our history and why we are here, as if you specifically are operating in bad faith, and wish to redefine why we did what we did.
The corruption in gaming journalism revealed by gamergate isn't unique to it but is endemic in journalism in general. So, why stop at pruning a few rotten branches, why not aim higher and try to topple the whole rotten tree?
Hello me, yes that is my opinion, I sure did explicitly state this on Reddit back in 2014. Thanks me. For a second I thought I forgot my opinion.
"It's just some small time players" intentionally discounts the fact that it is/was what we were fighting about.