It's funny that he's referencing Rabbi Peterson against someone who's not, to quote one of the comments, "kissing Jewish ass." That's his crime here. Again, as I said in my other comment, Jon has done plenty of shit to be condemned for, and he's not to be trusted, but his "crime" here was just not kissing ass hard enough. Hilarious and ridiculous attack against him.
Jon Del Arroz is a fucking shit...but not for this. This was actually based.
You really want me to condemn him for not falling for the Victim Narrative?
And, no, it's not about Da Jews. This would apply to anyone. This argument would be just as retarded if he were being condemned for not bowing down to female victimhood, or trans victimhood, or black victimhood, or whatever.
Being a victim - and especially the victimhood of someone you might be fucking distantly related to, from generations past - has no inherent value.
Again, Jon is a disingenuous piece of shit grifter. But he's not wrong in calling out this particular bullshit. And I'm not going to slam him for not falling for the guilt trip. In fact it makes me like this shit more. In this instance...good on you, Jon.
He's pulled a bunch of bullshit, but this is awesome. And this "Yorch" fella is using a bunch of leftist tactics to smear him.
Can I get some context please? I subbed to del arroz cause he covered some culture war stuff in fantasy books which I hadn't seen anyone else doing, but I don't watch him much. I saw people referring to him liking some weird furry tweet with a Pokemon once and I saw he called out smashjt for something a few days ago then smash was on his stream today, but I don't know what the beef was over
And that furry shit was out of context. It would be like condemning Sargon for calling Nazis "niggers." He was trolling people, but the people who already hated him used it to smear him as a furry.
JDA is somewhat sleezy and untrustworthy, but a bunch of the people attacking him are also disingenuous faggots using lefty smear tactics.
I think he's a total grifter, but aside from that clean. You can tell someone is clean when the worst attacks of their enemies are out of context lies.
JDA also denies the satanic panic, and hypocritically* bashes sexy women in media by calling it coomer shit despite the fact it's needed to suppress objectification theory.
*Proof of hypocrisy, the lucario coomerposts and sharing that anthro eevee drawing with the detailed nipple and vaginal outlines were the tip of the iceberg in regards to his hypocrisy:
Just recently the fucker responded to you by calling me a nomap with zero evidence despite the fact I condemned nomaps, and he also falsely suggested I post csem by calling lolisho "pornographic images of children".
I strongly recommend permabanning the fucker for defamation at this point, considering the fact I would have been globally permabanned if I posted csem.
"conservatives" can't even conserve the restroom.
Peterson doesn't even rise to that level.
It's funny that he's referencing Rabbi Peterson against someone who's not, to quote one of the comments, "kissing Jewish ass." That's his crime here. Again, as I said in my other comment, Jon has done plenty of shit to be condemned for, and he's not to be trusted, but his "crime" here was just not kissing ass hard enough. Hilarious and ridiculous attack against him.
Jon Del Arroz is a fucking shit...but not for this. This was actually based.
You really want me to condemn him for not falling for the Victim Narrative?
And, no, it's not about Da Jews. This would apply to anyone. This argument would be just as retarded if he were being condemned for not bowing down to female victimhood, or trans victimhood, or black victimhood, or whatever.
Being a victim - and especially the victimhood of someone you might be fucking distantly related to, from generations past - has no inherent value.
Again, Jon is a disingenuous piece of shit grifter. But he's not wrong in calling out this particular bullshit. And I'm not going to slam him for not falling for the guilt trip. In fact it makes me like this shit more. In this instance...good on you, Jon.
He's pulled a bunch of bullshit, but this is awesome. And this "Yorch" fella is using a bunch of leftist tactics to smear him.
Conservatives don’t do a fucking thing. They should be trying to destroy leftism.
Can I get some context please? I subbed to del arroz cause he covered some culture war stuff in fantasy books which I hadn't seen anyone else doing, but I don't watch him much. I saw people referring to him liking some weird furry tweet with a Pokemon once and I saw he called out smashjt for something a few days ago then smash was on his stream today, but I don't know what the beef was over
He's done some shit, but he's correct here.
And that furry shit was out of context. It would be like condemning Sargon for calling Nazis "niggers." He was trolling people, but the people who already hated him used it to smear him as a furry.
JDA is somewhat sleezy and untrustworthy, but a bunch of the people attacking him are also disingenuous faggots using lefty smear tactics.
I think he's a total grifter, but aside from that clean. You can tell someone is clean when the worst attacks of their enemies are out of context lies.
JDA also denies the satanic panic, and hypocritically* bashes sexy women in media by calling it coomer shit despite the fact it's needed to suppress objectification theory.
*Proof of hypocrisy, the lucario coomerposts and sharing that anthro eevee drawing with the detailed nipple and vaginal outlines were the tip of the iceberg in regards to his hypocrisy:
https://www.kickstarter.com/profile/forsteamandcountry/created
https://www.kickstarter.com/profile/forsteamandcountry/
So this guy bashes sexy women in media, except when he draws it I guess?
You can't tell what a pedo is even if they are raping your fucking relatives right in front of you.
There is zero evidence of pedophilia regarding myself, and subhuman retards like yourself do not belong here.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinfo
Comment Removed for: Rule 3 - Per Se Defamation
Stick to just criticizing his opinions and moderation
Just recently the fucker responded to you by calling me a nomap with zero evidence despite the fact I condemned nomaps, and he also falsely suggested I post csem by calling lolisho "pornographic images of children".
I strongly recommend permabanning the fucker for defamation at this point, considering the fact I would have been globally permabanned if I posted csem.
That specific comment wasn't given to me. Looks like someone reported the replies, but not that one.
I don't see your allegations reflected in his recent posts or comments feed.