There's a special symbol they use to indicate a changed view. It's as fake and gay as everything else on that site but that's probably the measure they're using. There are multiple sides to the astroturfing with everybody fucking with everybody else. It reminds of the Family Guy joke where one pedo accidentally lures another pedo to his house.
That's what I'm getting at. It's a bunch of shills trying to manipulate each other. Nothing about that site is genuine, and Spez is defrauding investors with obviously fake engagement numbers.
Its been known for a long time, that just repeating things over and over and giving the illusion of being the "main consensus" is pretty effective by itself.
Yes, repeatedly stating something can create the illusion of authority or truth, a phenomenon known as the "illusory truth effect" or "repetition bias". This effect is rooted in cognitive processing: when we hear something repeatedly, it becomes easier to process and recall, leading us to perceive it as more credible and therefore, more likely to be true.
How did they determine that a view was actually changed?
I skimmed it and only saw the part about being gifted reddit fag awards, but that isn't indicative of changing someone's mind.
"I'm a conservative and I get being against woke, but"
lol
There's a special symbol they use to indicate a changed view. It's as fake and gay as everything else on that site but that's probably the measure they're using. There are multiple sides to the astroturfing with everybody fucking with everybody else. It reminds of the Family Guy joke where one pedo accidentally lures another pedo to his house.
How do they know that those whose views were changed aren't also bots?
That's what I'm getting at. It's a bunch of shills trying to manipulate each other. Nothing about that site is genuine, and Spez is defrauding investors with obviously fake engagement numbers.
In that subreddit, you show that a post changed your mind by awarding a confirmed fag award called a "delta"
Gotcha. Safe to assume 99/100 are libs trying to make it seem like the argument is so strong that others should consider changing their view "too"
Funny enough, I was just thinking.
Its been known for a long time, that just repeating things over and over and giving the illusion of being the "main consensus" is pretty effective by itself.
Weird.