What's Causing Toxic Masculinity? [Freedom Toons]
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
For the handful that are good, there are 1000s that will lie and manipulate.
Like I said before, good women who are being wronged will have another man defend them.
Right now this society tends to believe the woman by default even when there is a lack of proof. This is a big part of the problem too because women will lie to gain power.
Women are by default born physically weaker then men and it plays into their psychology. Women will lie to get around being physically weaker. How do you fix the liars? How do you raise a woman to not be a manipulative liar when her mother already is? How do you raise a woman to not be feminist when her mother already is?
You want to fix feminism when its already embedded in the great great grandma to gen A? We've had 4 stages of feminism for over a century and now we're at the clown world point where some men want to cut off a dick and become a woman because they think it'll give them power.
Women follow whoever they perceive has the most power. Right now that is the government so they pander all the time to the government. If you want to fix feminism, the power needs to be established back in the household.
If you want to fix feminism you have to either have all men raise a generation of females all themselves which is unrealistic. Or you have to allow physical boundaries to be set.
Good women being wronged would have men defend them in a society that existed 70 years ago, not now. Equal Rights, Equal Lefts; means that women are required to defend themselves in society. Since they can't, they reach out to the government as intended.
You are correct that you have to raise women not to be liars, and to be respectful of men, but that has never come from violence. It explicitly comes from preserving a woman's value (as it is lost as they age), increasing it with her husband and children, and making her the pillar of a community. The whole point is that you don't disrespect a woman, as a man, by being violent with her. That is why all patriarchies support some variant of "men shouldn't hit women".
It means they look up to big government and not their husband or household.
And how about the countless women that marry for money, destroying even their childrens lives in the process? That trauma will get passed on to the next generation either by the kid not marrying or adopting that womens philosophy.
Kills the birth rate and brings Western Civilization closer to destruction. Nothing would need to be so drastic if the birth rate was at least at replacement levels but it is far from that.
You dont want to hit a woman but the threat of the violence needs to be there. Again, women pander to the government because government has all the power. That is a problem. They will generally only listen to whoever has the most power and that needs to be established back in the household.
If she is screeching and destroying your stuff, she absolutely needs to get slapped and kicked out.
At the end of the day though you dont have the stomach to fix a plummeting birth rate. If you were in charge, our civilization would continue to slip away.
Self-preservation and survival is the base of all morality.
Nothing is more important, not even your cherished "Womens Rights" than the self preservation of our species and this civilization. You dont seem to understand or care about this.
None of this can be cured with violence. Only stoicism, respect, and a sacral-duty of care to your wife that actually promotes a sense of self-security, rather than insecurity.
She doesn't even need to be slapped just physically removed to the outside. But that's all still in philosophical terms. In legal terms, you have to call the police, report domestic violence, get an order of protection, and immediately change the locks.
Congratulations: a woman's chance of survival goes DOWN when men hit her, not up. Hence you sew the seeds for your own destruction.
Cant really answer the problem of declining birth rates can you.
What are you a closet jew?
That wont fix the plummeting birth rate. The birth rate would also have to drastically increase in a generation, not a gradual increase over several decades.
Also you're saying pretty much the same thing men have been saying for decades. Its not fixing the problem. If a woman wants to take half your wealth, your kid, and upend your entire life, then being stoic will not help you. The problem is many women only have respect for where the power is and currently that is the government.
Now you got the government involved which is how this problem started in the first place. Feminism would have no legs to stand on without government. Govrrnment gives unequal treatment to the sexes and very often nutcase women are let off with a slap on the wrist. Government is also incentivized by this leniancy because they know women will tend to vote for bigger government (leftism).
It also goes down when she is left to her own devices.
You're not addressing my points now, you are dancing around them now. You dont have a viable solution to the birth rate problem. You put current women above the future of the species.
Not sure if I have to tell you this but women aren't going to want to suck your dick just because you're "fighting the edgelords" soyjack.