I hate to ask a stupid question but with the ruling being about transwomen and biological women, are transmen and biological male covered under this ruling? I mean to me the ruling would imply that. But I've frequently noticed common sense and court rulings aren't always Venn Diagram
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
This sets precedent. Either the parliament will address it and change the act to recognize the limits imposed by the court (unlikely) or this precedent will be used in other cases to apply this legal reasoning to other similar situations.
Both of those will take years. Probably more than one election cycle.