but you're not going to have a discussion with them

I literally do. I talk until they prove themselves to be completely retarded and then they usually meltdown and stop responding. It amuses me, and it has multiple times managed to be convincing to people watching.

In fact, I argued against them for so long I saw myself go from "all the downvotes for criticizing them" to multiple people saying the same things I was with all upvotes while they themselves became mostly downvoted for being obvious spergs. We literally were turning Telia from some sort of serious political activist to a partial jester people dunked on through sheer time and mockery.

You have power, and you have convinced yourself that using that power is morally just and good for dealing with things you dislike or simply don't want to do. Everything is flowing backwards from your own opinions to justify using the sword.

Yes they are some people who are dangerous to allow to speak, yes it might be a "good thing" to remove them entirely rather than deal with them. But that also applies to eugenics, there are people who should just be aborted rather than run the risk of dealing with them.

Heck, that even applies to groups. Plenty of people will argue that Jews or Niggers would fail this test and shouldn't be allowed to speak at all because their very existence and lying tongues are warfare. You've spoken the very logic by which someone might end up in a racewar mindset.

You'll certainly say "its different because <essay>" but that is in fact the exact same starting position.