We'd need to enforce this globally, which is a losing proposition. I agree that the technology should be purged and never resurrected but to abandon it entirely is to allow our enemies to gain a weapon about which we know nothing.
Not globally by any means. That's like saying you would have to enforce chocolate slave labor standards globally.
Just don't buy it from other countries.
It's not like it's nuclear proliferation, which failed anyway. It's a wicked, harmful technology that does more harm than good. Once it's banned here and the firehose of lies stops, it'll die out in any place that actually wants to look at the data. And the places that don't will die out from using it.
but to abandon it entirely is to allow our enemies to gain a weapon about which we know nothing.
If they want to give their populations turbo cancer, I say let them.
MRNA should be wholly outlawed, all research relating to it destroyed, and companies who peddled it in the past given the corporate death penalty.
And the individuals involved black listed from ever working in the medical field again.
We'd need to enforce this globally, which is a losing proposition. I agree that the technology should be purged and never resurrected but to abandon it entirely is to allow our enemies to gain a weapon about which we know nothing.
Not globally by any means. That's like saying you would have to enforce chocolate slave labor standards globally.
Just don't buy it from other countries.
It's not like it's nuclear proliferation, which failed anyway. It's a wicked, harmful technology that does more harm than good. Once it's banned here and the firehose of lies stops, it'll die out in any place that actually wants to look at the data. And the places that don't will die out from using it.
If they want to give their populations turbo cancer, I say let them.
Being behind in an arms race is not a position you want to find yourself in.
An arms race for giving yourself cancer?