A good point about artists and their debate with AI
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Some AI outputs are fundamentally still art because it's genuine human expression, but the automation of a vast portion of the art does limit its capacity for expression as well. Automated processes are great for efficiency, but limited in some aspects as creative options.
When I get the AI contest up and running, expressiveness will be weighted equal or greater to quality of detail.
I will say, I don't think art is supposed to be efficient. Part of art is that it is, to some extent, pointless. It's not about doing it the best way.
Good point, but if something is supposed to be pointless - because that produces materially different results - it is no longer actually pointless. Lol
Andy Warhol is a perfect example for efficiency. Not saying I am a fan but we've all seen some of his famous pieces, he made it all an efficient machine to produce works some people consider art. I could see AI be similar, different, easier and faster expression but an expression nonetheless.