What is celebrating "breaking the color barrier" if not celebrating "diversity and inclusion" ?
That said, I prefer the military be overtly hostile to Whites so that it accurately reflects what modern America is, and Whites stay out of the military.
I can sort of see your point, because "breaking the color barrier" sounds suspiciously like the way the media uses "makes history" - the only way history is made is if you're the first X. But it's also about someone who (AFAIK, I know nothing about him) was actually competent - so no diversity in my book.
So let me pose this question: would a book on the Roman struggle of the orders, which among other things led to plebeians being allowed to become consul (and in fact favoritism as at least one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian), also DEI?
Robinson was a good player AFAIK as well, but look what we are talking about. Professional sports is nothing more than entertainment. We can easily do without it or have nothing but Whites playing it or whatever. Black athletes get used to sell bad and destructive ideas about race.
So let me pose this question: would a book on the Roman struggle of the orders, which among other things led to plebeians being allowed to become consul (and in fact favoritism as at least one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian), also DEI?
Probably not since I don't see that bit of history being weaponized against Whites today.
Black athletes get used to sell bad and destructive ideas about race.
There’s a lot of things this entails, but I’m just curious, because I’m always trying to make sure what others think. Are we talking about the usual ghetto bullshit with rap and all the assorted nonsense, or what exactly?
That's part of it, but not really what I had in mind. Black athletes get used to sell the idea that we are missing out on something by not embracing multi-racialism, i.e. "think of wear the NBA without Jordan and Lebron" and those such arguments. Then that gets extended to all walks of life. The other downstream problem is that blacks then start asserting a preference for other blacks to coach them, as is the case in the NFL.
What is celebrating "breaking the color barrier" if not celebrating "diversity and inclusion" ?
That said, I prefer the military be overtly hostile to Whites so that it accurately reflects what modern America is, and Whites stay out of the military.
I can sort of see your point, because "breaking the color barrier" sounds suspiciously like the way the media uses "makes history" - the only way history is made is if you're the first X. But it's also about someone who (AFAIK, I know nothing about him) was actually competent - so no diversity in my book.
So let me pose this question: would a book on the Roman struggle of the orders, which among other things led to plebeians being allowed to become consul (and in fact favoritism as at least one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian), also DEI?
Robinson was a good player AFAIK as well, but look what we are talking about. Professional sports is nothing more than entertainment. We can easily do without it or have nothing but Whites playing it or whatever. Black athletes get used to sell bad and destructive ideas about race.
Probably not since I don't see that bit of history being weaponized against Whites today.
There’s a lot of things this entails, but I’m just curious, because I’m always trying to make sure what others think. Are we talking about the usual ghetto bullshit with rap and all the assorted nonsense, or what exactly?
That's part of it, but not really what I had in mind. Black athletes get used to sell the idea that we are missing out on something by not embracing multi-racialism, i.e. "think of wear the NBA without Jordan and Lebron" and those such arguments. Then that gets extended to all walks of life. The other downstream problem is that blacks then start asserting a preference for other blacks to coach them, as is the case in the NFL.