His M.O. is to say the most controversial thing he can in order to antagonize one side or the other and drive viewership, clicks and traffic. He has no principles, no ideological consistency and he doesn't actually believe anything he says or care about its veracity or truthfulness. He's just an extremely successful grifter.
His M.O. is to say the most controversial thing he can in order to antagonize one side or the other and drive viewership, clicks and traffic. He has no principles, no ideological consistency and he doesn't actually believe anything he says or care about its veracity or truthfulness. He's just an extremely successful grifter.