They are both called "pedos" according to these zealots and according to laws like the ones that Texas is trying to push, and that they are increasingly trying to make this opinion in to law by giving anime characters the same human rights as real people. .
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (173)
sorted by:
Sex acts? Penetration? Sexually explicit? Like I said, not hard to do. I'm not looking up loli but just putting a couple pictures of clearly little girls engaging in pornographic acts and a picture of DB with dokus little cartoon weiner would make this extremely evident. Like I've said, this is only an issue for weirdos,normal people could sort this out in two seconds because it isn't hard
So when is child nudity no longer sexually explicit? If someone went around drawing photos of 13 year old girls completely nude is that no longer loli as long as it makes some arbitrary "I knows it when I sees it" you made up? That's an extremely poor answer and once again its lol, lmao even worthy. Again, we are talking legality here. The SCOTUS already ruled the "obscenity" definition was useless and against the 1st Amendment, so you need to get more specific my nigga.
Also Japan figured the problem out because they made nearly all of it legal. They could have gag penis because in the backroom the hardcore stuff was also being sold. So your own example that you tried to pull undermines your entire position.
Again, you seem to know nothing about the topic you are trying to take a hard stance over nor the history of its legality and definitions. Which is fine, its a gross thing to even talk about, but makes you look retarded when you try to come in dick swinging about how righteous you are.
You argue like a faggot 14 year old, all this lol, lmao even and insulting just makes you sound like a twat.
Do the Japanese let six year olds buy hentai and loli porn? There is obviously a distinction between what is for adults and what is not, just like we are able to distinguish between what's porn and what's not here. If we can do that why can't we do it for loli porn? A bit of discretion and common sense goes a long way. If a child is getting graphically fucked, maybe that's loli porn. Looks like DB isn't loli. Real difficult
So now the goalpost has been moved to "well its okay to exist, as long as kids can't buy it." Great, something that is already the case to begin with in America too, making all of this meaningless.
Also, you still didn't answer the question with all that bluster. If there is a line to be drawn, where is it? You keep saying they figured it out, but you refuse to say what it is even though it should be as easy as copy/paste.
It shouldn't be difficult, but clearly it is because you've not answered it for multiple asks now.
No retard. I'm saying we're capable of making distinctions about what's appropriate or not. You make it sound impossible to do but we do it all the time. I actually have said the line multiple times, you're just determined to ignore it cause you don't like what I said.