The Disparate Impact Theory con is at the center of almost all modern leftist policy. They gerrymander demographics in order to bake statistics, and then they use those statistics as justification for restorative justice and decriminalization.
Law X results in more black people behind bars? Then law X is de facto racist!
No. Law X discriminates against criminals. If discriminating against criminals results in more black people behind bars, then maybe the black demographic is the problem.
Never did understand how this could be argued in court with a straight face; by all accounts every law aught to be struck down as discriminatory under its logic, but there seems to be a détente not to take the ide to its rational conclusion.
The Disparate Impact Theory con is at the center of almost all modern leftist policy. They gerrymander demographics in order to bake statistics, and then they use those statistics as justification for restorative justice and decriminalization.
Law X results in more black people behind bars? Then law X is de facto racist!
No. Law X discriminates against criminals. If discriminating against criminals results in more black people behind bars, then maybe the black demographic is the problem.
Never did understand how this could be argued in court with a straight face; by all accounts every law aught to be struck down as discriminatory under its logic, but there seems to be a détente not to take the ide to its rational conclusion.