Every fucking "influencer" account on Twitter:
"🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨 [Some shit that is literally completely untrue]"
Every fucking post on T_D:
"OMG LOOK AT THIS TWEET IT SAYS 🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨 [Some shit that is literally completely untrue]!!!"
Every fucking comment on that post on T_D:
+8,483 "TRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASON FAGGOTS OMG TREASON"
+1,021 "GUYS FAGGOTS TREASON FAGGOTS "
+898 "RICO THE FAGGOTS FIND OUT WHAT FAGGOTS IS PAYING THE FAGGOTS"
-12,484 "Guys this is literally made up."
L +184,944 "YOU SOUND VAXXED FAGGOT GET ANOTHER FAGGOT BOOSTER FAGGOT GLOWIE FAGGOT FED FAGGOT SHILL DEPORT THIS FAGGOT"
--
The next day...
--
@NeverMentionsAIPAC:
"🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨 [Some shit that is still completely untrue]"
@BoomerOakleysProfilePic:
"#WETHEPEOPLE WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND TREASON CHARGES WE THE PEOPLE THE PEOPLE WEEEE WEEEE EEOPEOPPLE WEETHEPEOPEL MUH SEKINT AMENDURRRP"
--
The next day...
--
@IFindRetards:
"[posts anything in response to any Democrat]"
Every fucking post on T_D:
"LOL OMG ROFL HE TOTALLY DESTROYED THEM NUKED FROM ORBIT OWNED BITCH SLAPPED OBLITERATED"
--
The next day...
--
@TotallyReallyKashPatelDefinitelyNotFake:
"The FBI has made 83 arrests of prominent politicians an hour ago tied to Epstein's Island, a press release and mugshots will be coming a 2 PM"
T_D: 7,943,105 comments:
"OMG IT'S HAPPENING THIS EXTREMELY REAL TWITTER ACCOUNT THAT DEFINITELY IS KASH PATEL TOLD US IT'S HAPPENING HOLY SHIT GUYS, THIS IS WHY LIBERALS HATE US BECAUSE WE'RE SO VERY INCREDIBLY INTELLIGENT!"
sigh
Sorry to break it to you, but social media in general is a retarded cesspool.
A genuine question is raised by your comment, in context of the OP's topic.
Traitors are more dangerous than enemies at the gate, so should be dealt with more quickly and harshly. By that same logic, should falsehoods and mistakes be corrected among our own first, or should we direct our ire primarily at the out-groups? Just curious what ya'll's thoughts are. By focusing on the out-groups first, we tackle problems from the most disagreeable downward, but by focusing on the in-group first, we tackle dissent within our own ranks first. This isn't inherently an either/or scenario. Just wondering which is more important to y'all.