How so?

In the way that "in rare, understandable cases like incest and rape" became turned fractionally rare occurences into somehow a common thing that all women go through. Or that "early enough that its not alive" evolved into certain states pushing the "mother's life in danger" to just deciding that "anytime" qualifies.

Every single "common sense" metric was just redefined until it basically did nothing, as the Left and women will always do.

So you'd rather save zero rather than 50%?

We'd improve the life of the common Israeli by removing every Arab in existence, but I feel like you'd consider that not something we can only just genocide a few countries on. Or pick and choose any continent on this regard.

Again, you only look at issues through optics and winning and don't seem to understand not everyone thinks like you and has moral standings. Even if it might be the "best result."