The fundamental difference between these two statements is that one is actionable and one is not. You can’t have a sustainable, functional society without men - or without women - because the human species is sexually dimorphic and requires both sexes to reproduce and survive. You can, however, have racially homogeneous societies that thrive and prosper. In fact, that was the default state of humanity for most of its existence.
This is why anyone who responds to racial or ethnic discussions with “what about feminism” is just a retard. Women are a necessary condition. Feminism is a problem, but the solution is still going to require coexistence. This isn’t the case for multiculturalism. The solution to that problem is just literal separation.
So no, the two statements in this tweet are not equivalent. The facts of black violence are actually useful and can inform viable policy.
The fundamental difference between these two statements is that one is actionable and one is not. You can’t have a sustainable, functional society without men - or without women - because the human species is sexually dimorphic and requires both sexes to reproduce and survive. You can, however, have racially homogeneous societies that thrive and prosper. In fact, that was the default state of humanity for most of its existence.
This is why anyone who responds to racial or ethnic discussions with “what about feminism” is just a retard. Women are a necessary condition. Feminism is a problem, but the solution is still going to require coexistence. This isn’t the case for multiculturalism. The solution to that problem is just literal separation.
So no, the two statements in this tweet are not equivalent. The facts of black violence are actually useful and can inform viable policy.