Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

121
A core lie of the democrat party (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by SophiesBoyfriend 1 year ago by SophiesBoyfriend +121 / -0
98 comments share
98 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
▲ 17 ▼
– yeldarb1983 17 points 1 year ago +17 / -0

It's not an either

let's use a less politically charged example to explore this question. If I were to hire somebody to kill my boss (not that I would, but stay with me), am I the murderer, or is the guy who I hired the murderer? the answer is we were both accomplices to the act.

in the case of the abortion, this would mean that both were culpable, which raises the stats in both directions, though disproportionately on one side.

not trying to be a dick here, but I'm a little too autistic not to poke that hole in the logic, lol.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

let's use a less politically charged example to explore this question. If I were to hire somebody to kill my boss (not that I would, but stay with me), am I the murderer, or is the guy who I hired the murderer? the answer is we were both accomplices to the act.

Right. I'm not sure on the exact English terminology, but this is certainly directionally correct.

But normally, anti-abortion advocates say that they only want to go after the doctors. If they start branding the women as murderers, then this implies that they also want to prosecute the women for murder, and this would be a bad idea for them - or at least the politicians who have such an albatross around their neck.

not trying to be a dick here

Far from it. You are making a good point. I like it when people make good arguments (not very common), even ones that poke holes in my logic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– yeldarb1983 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

But normally, anti-abortion advocates say that they only want to go after the doctors.

I can only speak for myself on this, but here goes.

on the one hand, the moral choice would be to go after the doctors and the women, but as you said, there are pragmatic reasons not to. If the goal is to stop as many abortions as possible while shifting what little public support there is in favor of stopping abortions as little as possible, then it makes sense to target doctors(god i hope that's not too confusing, lol). it's a trade off. =/

I like it when people make good arguments (not very common), even ones that poke holes in my logic.

yeah, but text-based conversations are prone to misunderstandings, and I tend to overthink things, so here we are, lmao.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

If the goal is to stop as many abortions as possible while shifting what little public support there is in favor of stopping abortions as little as possible, then it makes sense to target doctors(god i hope that's not too confusing, lol). it's a trade off.

Nope, makes perfect sense. Of course, it opens people up to the accusation of hypocrisy, same as leftists when they're OK with a murderer being prosecuted for double murder when a woman is pregnant, thus recognizing the potential life as a child in that context but not others.

yeah, but text-based conversations are prone to misunderstandings, and I tend to overthink things, so here we are, lmao.

Not a bad thing. It's not exactly as if there is a surfeit of pleasant people here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– yeldarb1983 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

you can the wins you can get, not the wins you can't, lol.

It's not exactly as if there is a surfeit of pleasant people here.

šŸŽ¶welcome to the internetšŸŽ¶

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy