Until you obtain these skills, you should be happy to have a job at all.
And once we cull all the useless plebs who aren't ever going to be skilled enough for a job where you can make negotiations, then our society will be great again!
We can just fill those useless easily replaceable jobs with jeets and illegals to get us by, of course. While we shit on the less capable whites who can't make something of themselves for being worthless lazy losers who should be thankful they can be allowed to flip fucking burgers for pennies for us Real Chads in Real Jobs.
This mindset certainly isn't just repeating the exact same cycle that Boomers had that led us to half the messes we are trying to clean up right now.
Those are two separate sides of your argument. Gaining skills and being irreplaceable useful/good at your work are the best way to go about things and always will be.
Saying people should be happy to just have a job at all if they aren't part of the upper half of society, is egotistical speak from someone who thinks himself irreplaceable and above the lowly masses.
Its the exact mindset that is behind "if you don't go to college, you won't ever succeed at anything in life" that destroyed our entire job market, academia, and numerous other facets of society. Because civilization is filled with jobs that have low end or even no skills that are crucial to our functioning, and treating them as pathetic prizes easily replaced is how we end up with Jeets owning every gas station and Mexicans in every field.
phrase it however you want. The reality is, if you aren't desirable above the rest, the odds of having and keeping a job are dicey. No amount of commie-speak can make things otherwise.
Except it isn't, because you are competing with the same low skill level competition. Which means the fact that you are already hired, the paperwork done, and the training complete puts you well ahead of any new hire unless you are well below productivity or some other major factor. Which is how something like McDonald's could be a "career" for someone who money wasn't a major factor, instead of requiring it to be a transitory period.
You know, the way it worked for decades. Until the wrench got thrown of "we can just hire illegals at slave rates so we are doing you a favor by keeping you hired, so you best be happy about it."
I know its fun to say things that are diametrically opposed to the Leftists' version, but that's the kind of short sighted thinking that gets us into messes and makes the Right easy to manipulate.
And once we cull all the useless plebs who aren't ever going to be skilled enough for a job where you can make negotiations, then our society will be great again!
We can just fill those useless easily replaceable jobs with jeets and illegals to get us by, of course. While we shit on the less capable whites who can't make something of themselves for being worthless lazy losers who should be thankful they can be allowed to flip fucking burgers for pennies for us Real Chads in Real Jobs.
This mindset certainly isn't just repeating the exact same cycle that Boomers had that led us to half the messes we are trying to clean up right now.
I'm not saying it's right or moral, that's just how it is. if you don't want to be replaced, don't be replaceable.
Those are two separate sides of your argument. Gaining skills and being irreplaceable useful/good at your work are the best way to go about things and always will be.
Saying people should be happy to just have a job at all if they aren't part of the upper half of society, is egotistical speak from someone who thinks himself irreplaceable and above the lowly masses.
Its the exact mindset that is behind "if you don't go to college, you won't ever succeed at anything in life" that destroyed our entire job market, academia, and numerous other facets of society. Because civilization is filled with jobs that have low end or even no skills that are crucial to our functioning, and treating them as pathetic prizes easily replaced is how we end up with Jeets owning every gas station and Mexicans in every field.
phrase it however you want. The reality is, if you aren't desirable above the rest, the odds of having and keeping a job are dicey. No amount of commie-speak can make things otherwise.
Except it isn't, because you are competing with the same low skill level competition. Which means the fact that you are already hired, the paperwork done, and the training complete puts you well ahead of any new hire unless you are well below productivity or some other major factor. Which is how something like McDonald's could be a "career" for someone who money wasn't a major factor, instead of requiring it to be a transitory period.
You know, the way it worked for decades. Until the wrench got thrown of "we can just hire illegals at slave rates so we are doing you a favor by keeping you hired, so you best be happy about it."
I know its fun to say things that are diametrically opposed to the Leftists' version, but that's the kind of short sighted thinking that gets us into messes and makes the Right easy to manipulate.
We import too much unskilled labor, while having exported most of our actually valuable low skill jobs.