If you were really dumb and didn't see that it's almost exactly what Elon did with Twitter, I guess you would start saying libertarian boilerplate like "absolute power corrupts absolutely".
Twitter isn't nationalised. It's explicitly private. It might be what you want to see happen to sites like Wikipedia, but it's not nationalised.
And no, I wouldn't say that. I would say that the solution to a problem isn't adding in more of the problem. Wikipedia is a problem because it's an in-group cabal. Further entrenching the strength of a cabal, even if you replace the members, doesn't fix the problem. It's merely replacing it until it too gets taken over again and again and again.
Yeah. Because everyone knows that nationalised sectors aren't pozzed vectors of ideological spread.
Your solution to corruption is a greater form of corruption.
If you were really dumb and didn't see that it's almost exactly what Elon did with Twitter, I guess you would start saying libertarian boilerplate like "absolute power corrupts absolutely".
Twitter isn't nationalised. It's explicitly private. It might be what you want to see happen to sites like Wikipedia, but it's not nationalised.
And no, I wouldn't say that. I would say that the solution to a problem isn't adding in more of the problem. Wikipedia is a problem because it's an in-group cabal. Further entrenching the strength of a cabal, even if you replace the members, doesn't fix the problem. It's merely replacing it until it too gets taken over again and again and again.