Scaling down, streamlining, and revamping US “foreign aid” to do away with the extraneous liberal identity nonsense is not necessarily tantamount to any intrinsic repudiation of US “foreign aid.” At core, it’s more likely a bureaucratic and political reorganization of US “foreign aid” provisions, in line with what Republicans tend to agree is the overriding imperative of countering “Communist China’s strategy of world domination.” And if that’s the civilizational-scale policy goal, it will probably require more sketchy “aid,” not less.

In other words, don't expect a non-interventionalist foreign policy just because USAID(s) got smashed.