In the post-Cold War period, “I would venture that U.S.A.I.D. is as good if not better than any of the others that are out there,” he said, and cutting it would be “a tragedy for the people affected.”
“I think it’s sort of appalling, actually,” he said.
Being "as good or better" than something terrible means nothing.
And obviously you think it's appalling because the funds were being used almost exclusively to further your commie bullshit.
The NYT still calling him "Mr. Trump" is hilarious.
Being "as good or better" than something terrible means nothing.
And obviously you think it's appalling because the funds were being used almost exclusively to further your commie bullshit.
The NYT still calling him "Mr. Trump" is hilarious.
Not defending them, but it looks pretty standard to me: the first mention is "President Trump", and afterwards "Mr. Trump".
Compare to a 2016 article on Obama, which does the same: https://archive.is/XxGj4
Ah okay. I didn't realize that so thanks for pointing it out.