The New Queen of "Cuckservative" Movement EXPOSED!
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
You've seen some stuff. I knew parts of it, but that it's this bad?
You can... potentially. But you can also be in an echochamber where you are convinced that group X is bad because the echochamber is only posting bad things about them. Why do you think feminists hate men so much? It's because in their world, they focus on "bad things men do to women". Imp focuses on "bad things women do to men", and makes up a good number of conspiracies to bolster his hatred so that it's now self-sustaining.
That is the sense that I get from these Stormfags. They have no endgoal that they are willing to admit to.
It's one thing to go from being neutral to hating someone. But to worship someone for four years and then make him Public Enemy No. 1. I mean, you could wonder that maybe he had a point.
Mike Pence, of course, was a neocon. I'm not really a fan of him. And I don't like the establishment. But even Pence siding with the establishment can be the correct decision, if DJT is making unreasonable demands.
This does make sense. Crenshaw brings nothing to the table, and plenty of bad things. I just wonder about the logic of it. People say "I hate Crenshaw because of red flag laws". That doesn't make any sense - because that would apply to Trump. They don't say "I hate Crenshaw because of ... and because there is nothing to make up for it".
Yup.
I'm banned from talking about my childhood in the house, by both my wife and former roommates. If that tells you enough.
Well most people want to live off memes and injokes instead of actually grappling with the idea. They want to be part of the group, so they will just adopt surface level traits of it and then begin to virtue signal. You can't stop such retardation, the same way you can't uplift normies or savages.
But I think most people don't fall for echo chambers because of the strength of the echo, they fall for it because its what they wanted to hear. Imp wanted to hate women (for some personal reason I never found out) and so he built a case to do so, as do feminists who start out afraid of men (due to trauma or paranoia) and then build an ideology to make that seem "correct and normal."
And I've found most of the time, these echo chambers start by someone wanting to feel like a contrarian, a rebel, and a martyr. Most "racist" ideologies start that way online, by someone who feels cool saying Nigger/Faggot/Kike/etc. and gets off on people hating them. And from there they build an ideology to "justify" it.
I don't think its any different than being great friends with your brother's wife for years and then flipping on her when she cheats on him and a divorce happens. Major, image changing decisions can and should cause people to be treated with consequence.
In his case, it was to be discarded to the winds of history as a nobody and a snake.
Most people are smarter than given credit for, but they can't verbalize or conceptualize it. In fact, asking them to do so will often talk them into dumber spots.
So they by learned instinct recognize Crenshaw brings nothing to the table, and would be nothing without their support that made him more than a faceless Congresscritter, so they can turn on him on a dime. While Trump clearly is much harder to do so because they logically know his value, so he is given leeway.
Now those people should work to improve their ability to verbalize the logic for themselves, but again you can't uplift normies very much.