Even if the inevitable legislation follow-up falls through, 4 years of these parasites being unemployable is a loud message about how to behave in the future. Most of the fed drones are entirely self-serving rather than true believers, they talked the talk because it played well and got them cushy benefits. Now they got burned and know they're playing with fire.
Or it could just spur on more spiteful behaviour under the idea that they need to get as much done in the 4 years they have.
You're assuming the lesson will be taken as "we need to behave ourselves or this could happen again" and not "This could happen again, we need to push harder than ever before".
Yeah, that'd be the true believer response. I just think most of the deep state actors are probably dirty rats rather than zealots. The zealots flock to the NGOs more.
I'd agree in business where profit is the general motive, but in government/state "services" I'm more inclined to lean on the desire for power and control rather than immediate gain.
Think about the kind of person that becomes a school teacher, ESPECIALLY the types that we see all over social media pushing agendas that they absolutely go out of their way to do. Their purpose in life is advocacy, not just to have a job. They're absolutely zealots. The teachers of our childhood are absolutely gone. The teachers that are interested in teaching are a loooong forgotten minority in the system.
Ah I'm seeing these cuts as working from the top down, cutting out the DoE for example won't disenfranchise a single teacher, just a bunch of politically ambitious bureaucrats that hand teachers absurd procedures to follow if they want that sweet fed funding.
Yeah the ones who stay as lower level gov. employees are more like zealots, but the higher up the bureaucracy you go, the more likely zealots are to be supplanted by people for whom personal power was the primary goal rather than an afterthought. They'll speak like zealots to control the zealots below them, but they'll flip flop for any bigger threat to their position.
Even if the inevitable legislation follow-up falls through, 4 years of these parasites being unemployable is a loud message about how to behave in the future. Most of the fed drones are entirely self-serving rather than true believers, they talked the talk because it played well and got them cushy benefits. Now they got burned and know they're playing with fire.
Or it could just spur on more spiteful behaviour under the idea that they need to get as much done in the 4 years they have.
You're assuming the lesson will be taken as "we need to behave ourselves or this could happen again" and not "This could happen again, we need to push harder than ever before".
Yeah, that'd be the true believer response. I just think most of the deep state actors are probably dirty rats rather than zealots. The zealots flock to the NGOs more.
I'd agree in business where profit is the general motive, but in government/state "services" I'm more inclined to lean on the desire for power and control rather than immediate gain.
Think about the kind of person that becomes a school teacher, ESPECIALLY the types that we see all over social media pushing agendas that they absolutely go out of their way to do. Their purpose in life is advocacy, not just to have a job. They're absolutely zealots. The teachers of our childhood are absolutely gone. The teachers that are interested in teaching are a loooong forgotten minority in the system.
Ah I'm seeing these cuts as working from the top down, cutting out the DoE for example won't disenfranchise a single teacher, just a bunch of politically ambitious bureaucrats that hand teachers absurd procedures to follow if they want that sweet fed funding.
Yeah the ones who stay as lower level gov. employees are more like zealots, but the higher up the bureaucracy you go, the more likely zealots are to be supplanted by people for whom personal power was the primary goal rather than an afterthought. They'll speak like zealots to control the zealots below them, but they'll flip flop for any bigger threat to their position.