Every single racial/ethnic identity group necessarily contains at least a minority of extremists, but for some reason only whites are denied racial/ethnic solidarity due to the potential dangers posed by their most insane members. No one argues that the NAACP should be shut down because blacks are murdering whites in South Africa. No one argues that Latino orgs need to go because cartels are beheading children.

The truth is that every non-white race/ethnicity uses accusations of nazism to sabotage nascent white solidarity movements because they threaten to compete with non-white interests. Demanding total moral purity - from a demographic of hundreds of millions of people - as a prerequisite for any political or cultural solidarity is bullshit. These racial and ethnic groups actively and openly organize in direct opposition to the interests of white peoples, and plenty of that opposition can be described as extreme. But their extremists are ignored, excused, or even promoted by the rest of their groups. Probably because extremists are, on balance, highly motivated and thus super useful to political and cultural movements.

So yeah, an accusation of bigotry directed at whites by non-whites is just an evolved strategy to outcompete the majority white populations of western host nations. You can’t organize along racial/ethnic lines. You can’t advocate using healthy evolved in-group biases. You need to sit silent and supportive while every other demographic organizes explicitly against you.