Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

126
WaPo cartoonist arrested for child pornography possession (twitter.com)
posted 6 months ago by Ahaus667 6 months ago by Ahaus667 +126 / -0
61 comments share
61 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Adamrises 4 points 6 months ago +4 / -0

You are chewing on a poisoned apple. Just leave it alone

This line of reasoning equally applies to "don't defend it, let them criminalize thought crimes and things with no legal basis other than they don't like it." Because it never stops at obvious and justified.

Which is why its an actual problem instead of a "fun thought experiment" with an entire Supreme Court case behind it as being 100% legal once.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Feelsgood2020 1 point 6 months ago +1 / -0

Are we doing the "meeee, slippery slope" argument?

We are very clearly talking about the creation of images that imitate the appearance of children, designed to produce sexual stimulation and response. A physical recreation. It is not simply a thought crime. It is a clear line.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 6 months ago +2 / -0

Acknowledging the obvious argument I will make doesn't make the argument wrong, but good try there.

It is a clear line.

It isn't and the fact that you think it is shows how little thought you've put into it. You should try reading the Supreme Court case on it, you might learn something.

But I guess someone who goes with "hey, you don't want to look like a BAD GUY for defending this do you? Don't defend it, just let it happen" as a rationale doesn't want to delve into complexities and consequences. Better to just stick with "ME NO LIKE" as all legal basis.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Feelsgood2020 1 point 6 months ago +1 / -0

You think I care about the Supreme Court's opinion on pornography? I am decades on this earth beyond that. "Know it when I see it" or what John Ashcroft has to say about the matter is irrelevant.

The original point stands. Do not waste your time providing cover for content of such a profane nature. It is not an argument in support of personal freedom. It is an argument in support of cultural degeneracy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 6 months ago +2 / -0

You think I care about the Supreme Court's opinion on pornography?

It was actually on the specific metric when it goes from Child Porn to Not in regards to simulation of such, a very relevant discussion on legality even if you disagree with their conclusion.

But no I didn't, that's what the last paragraph was conveying. You've already plugged your ears to learning or thinking and now are trying to pathetically threaten people into following suit with sad "you will look gross if you do this!" level discourse.

Fortunately for those in charge, useful idiots like you are a dime a dozen to vote for censorship if they package it in "think of the children!" paper.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - wpl9c (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy