Trump posts video blaming Netanyahu for "endless wars"
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
I ascribe goodwill to Trump because he held off the Jewish war machine in his first term. That takes extreme force.
The reality is that you can't be president unless you kiss the wailing wall. I'd rather we have a semi-based president that does the needful instead of Nikki Haley, who would definitely invade Iran.
The idea that we can just vote down everyone who says 6 million died in the Holocaust until we rally behind General Sam Hyde in the civil war is a fantasy. The country will be too far gone at that point.
I agree with this. That's one of the few good things he did do in his first term. However, our problems are far, far more systemic and deep than just constant warmongering.
You're already capitulating to something that leads to ruin. If you capitulate to that, it doesn't matter who you pick. Your "lesser evil" choice will either kill you quickly, or kill you slowly, but you'll still die.
Considering Trump's rhetoric surrounding Israel, Iran, the "hostages", and the Middle East, and who funded his campaign, I'm not entirely certain he'll be another peaceful president in his 2nd term.
More capitulation and compromise. WW2 and the Holocaust is false history, and the central foundation of the new world satanic religion. How one views those topics is one of the key indicators if they're your friend and ally, or if they're your enemy. This topic can't be compromised, full stop, no exceptions.
The success of Western civilization brings untold comforts. Those comforts engender inaction and apathy. It takes a long time for a huge successful civilization to fail and collapse. We're in the middle to end stages of the slide toward collapse. That collapse is the only thing that will save us. No amount of pandering, compromise, and capitulation to work within the confines of the absurdly corrupted systems will work to save us. Not one iota.
We can, of course, work to build up and maintain our own communities, and elect our own leaders, in our systems that we can rebuild. That is our required work, to help save all who can be.
I only provide this as a warning. Feel free to take heed, or not.
It's a good start.
A lot of this is business negotiation, and it works.
There is not a single influential politician in the First World that will endorse that viewpoint in public.
Pushing the Overton window is the far superior option if available, which thankfully it still is.
Historically, a collapse has never saved anything. Let me know if you can find an example.
You can only negotiate with someone who isn't trying to destroy you. Negotiation necessarily requires that it be in good faith. Our enemies are actively killing us, are subversive liars, and don't negotiate in good faith. They can't be negotiated with.
Further, when your position is good and true, you never, ever capitulate or compromise with falsehoods and lies. To do so only erodes your position and lets your enemies pull you down to hell, one inch at a time, with one compromise at a time.
Which is why I've been saying that we can't fix our problems through our own political systems any more. Voting, judicial systems, law enforcement, none of it works in our interests any more. They're all actively working against us, and for our enemies.
However, this doesn't mean we're out of options. It just means we have only one option left.
Why do you think so many people have woken up the last several years? Open communication of the problems and perpetrators is one cause. But, the main cause is widespread misery of the people. The weight of all the lies is resulting in our civilization accelerating toward collapse. Our comforts, systems, traditions, bulwarks, and protections are being taken away. People are being made miserable due to the lies. Thus, people are realizing something is wrong, realizing the lies they've been told no longer make sense, they're looking around for answers, self reflecting, and changing according to the new information they find. Information exchange is a downstream role in the awakening of the people. The root cause is loss of comforts.
The only things that can and should be saved are people. We can rebuild things that are destroyed. However, I highly doubt absolutely everything would be destroyed in the coming collapse and war. A collapse will rob our enemies of all their power structures, which they are using against us. For an example, it's not necessarily a "collapse", but the American Revolution is what I'm alluding to, but that will pail in comparison. Electricity will go down, fuel shipments will stop, law enforcement will be woefully undermanned (and trapped mostly in the cities), all manner of crime will become rampant, many people will starve and die to violence. This will mostly happen in the first few months of the collapse, though. People will naturally collectivize to protect themselves. It will be in small enclaves first, mostly around farmers (people that have food and can grow more of it), and it will spread outward from there. Militias will also form, small at first, but grow bigger over time, with home bases centered around farmland. Throughout history, civilizational collapses are common, and happen to everyone. The collapses are worse with highly advanced and successful civilizations. However, even through these collapses, the people remain. They simply reform governments and redraw borders after the collapse. That is what's going to happen in the West, regardless of what we want, or how we plan it.
I'm not saying I want all of this to happen, either. I would love to be able to solve our problems peaceful. But, I'm saying the collapse and mass violence are necessary, and our only path to solving our problems. You've already actively admitted that everyone in Western politics doesn't pass one of the crucial tests to determine friend from foe.
That's simply not true. Negotiation is a huge part of war. You're confusing it with the spirit of reconciliation, which you would be correct is impossible with someone trying to destroy you.
Well keep your powder dry I guess. If that's the case then none of this is meaningful to you.
Yes, you need both to some degree. People aren't motivated to seek truth unless they are moved by an impetus.
Credit to you for out of the box thinking, but although scarcity is a common denominator in both wartime and civilizational collapse, you admit the Revolution was not a collapse and we both know why.
What you have outlined is a recipe for warlords and bandits where there are no noble ideas and causes, only survival. We know what people trained on survival look like. They're not the nation building type. Most likely another power would land a beachhead and push inland.
Best case for a doomsday scenario imo is that America becomes balkanized enough for a constitutional, ethnonationalist contingent to secede. A secession would preserve enough integrity of organization and continuity of government for a successful nation. This would be most akin to the American Revolution since the colonies were practically self-governing entities when they rebelled.