They chose wrong. At a certain point, we are the hegemon, they are our cousins, and their choice was irreconcilable with human civilization. Thus, their choice must be corrected.
Not a very Libertarian thing for me to say, but when your choice demands the violation of the NAP against the defenseless, I don't think any autistic lolbert arguments are persuasive.
I don't remember the context of this conversation. I assume that, like always, you ignore everything I said and made up your own context, and are now misapplying it here.
See, child rape is bad, m'kay? I don't really care whether or not you like the English. I don't care whether you consider them Capital W White or not. I don't care if you think of them as cousins or as an intractable foe.
The mass child rape is a problem that is so extreme it is an anathema to civilization and a crime against humanity. I don't really care what post-hoc rationalization you are making to respond to institutionally supported mass child rape as a weapon of conquest with "good", but no, it's not good.
I guess I just want to reach out to whatever sliver of humanity you have left to try and convince you that no: not good.
They're constantly choosing not to act. If they want to kill themselves and let their kids get raped, we're better off without them in the gene pool. They're just pissing in it, along with the Muslims.
I hate retards and don't want to support them. Europe voted for this shit, and hasn't stopped it. They need to do something themselves. They aren't, so they aren't worth saving.
They can do it themselves or die out. And they're choosing the latter.
We're only about 10% of the world's population, and shrinking. The time is coming where we stand together or let ourselves continue to go extinct.
Letting retards live is how we got to this point.
Decadence is how we got to this point. And you're not far behind, unfortunately.
They chose wrong. At a certain point, we are the hegemon, they are our cousins, and their choice was irreconcilable with human civilization. Thus, their choice must be corrected.
Not a very Libertarian thing for me to say, but when your choice demands the violation of the NAP against the defenseless, I don't think any autistic lolbert arguments are persuasive.
I’ve been told this doesn’t matter.
By you.
He didn't mention "White" [sic] people.
I don't remember the context of this conversation. I assume that, like always, you ignore everything I said and made up your own context, and are now misapplying it here.
See, child rape is bad, m'kay? I don't really care whether or not you like the English. I don't care whether you consider them Capital W White or not. I don't care if you think of them as cousins or as an intractable foe.
The mass child rape is a problem that is so extreme it is an anathema to civilization and a crime against humanity. I don't really care what post-hoc rationalization you are making to respond to institutionally supported mass child rape as a weapon of conquest with "good", but no, it's not good.
I guess I just want to reach out to whatever sliver of humanity you have left to try and convince you that no: not good.
Dude, that's what you do in nearly all of your long-winded slap fights.
They're constantly choosing not to act. If they want to kill themselves and let their kids get raped, we're better off without them in the gene pool. They're just pissing in it, along with the Muslims.
Stop trying to fracture us even more. If you hate a member of the European races just say so.
I hate retards and don't want to support them. Europe voted for this shit, and hasn't stopped it. They need to do something themselves. They aren't, so they aren't worth saving.
This was never an issue until 1997. The English are occupied by people that hate them. That's not a good enough reason not to try and help.