It legit seems like it sometimes, but some are users I generally recognize as being coherent most of the time. Just frothing at the mouth and not even reading things completely before responding the past couple days. "If I don't get 100% what I want right now then it's all over." Childish and unproductive.
“If Trump won’t stop the great replacement, what’s the point?”
“PURITY TESTING! GRIFTER!”
The revelation that people very close to Trump harbor completely unacceptable views on immigration - which was the primary issue that elected Trump in the first place - is not a minor disagreement that should blow over.
You're greatly overstating the coherence and cogence of the people sperging and cherry picking the worst and most simplistic counter arguments in an attempt to paint yourself in a positive light, but we both know you're well aware that's what you're doing.
It's not a binary "open the jeet floodgates and die" versus "shut them completely and prosper" kind of situation. I think it's good that this has been put into the limelight, but yes, people who are willing to throw away two very capable and powerful allies over this spat are shortsighted and not acting in a pragmatic manner. To the point it's understandable some would come to expect nefarious intent.
Doomposting and black pilling are almost never productive. Call out what you think is wrong and present what you think good solutions look like. Don't go around posting "we're finished," "Trump is done before even assuming office," etc. It's entirely counterproductive to your stated desires and goals.
One of the upsides to a Vivek / Elon vs a Soros is the level of transparency. This debate is taking place out in the open and putting a spotlight on this issue that it hasn't gotten before. This is inherently good for people who want to strictly clamp down on immigration; sperging and doomposting is not.
They know he's not the messiah. Most of the people complaining are people who've always hated him and want the populist right to die.
The populist right needs replacement immigration in order to survive, eh?
The populist right doesn't need either replacement migration or race communism to survive.
It legit seems like it sometimes, but some are users I generally recognize as being coherent most of the time. Just frothing at the mouth and not even reading things completely before responding the past couple days. "If I don't get 100% what I want right now then it's all over." Childish and unproductive.
“If Trump won’t stop the great replacement, what’s the point?”
“PURITY TESTING! GRIFTER!”
The revelation that people very close to Trump harbor completely unacceptable views on immigration - which was the primary issue that elected Trump in the first place - is not a minor disagreement that should blow over.
You're greatly overstating the coherence and cogence of the people sperging and cherry picking the worst and most simplistic counter arguments in an attempt to paint yourself in a positive light, but we both know you're well aware that's what you're doing.
It's not a binary "open the jeet floodgates and die" versus "shut them completely and prosper" kind of situation. I think it's good that this has been put into the limelight, but yes, people who are willing to throw away two very capable and powerful allies over this spat are shortsighted and not acting in a pragmatic manner. To the point it's understandable some would come to expect nefarious intent.
Doomposting and black pilling are almost never productive. Call out what you think is wrong and present what you think good solutions look like. Don't go around posting "we're finished," "Trump is done before even assuming office," etc. It's entirely counterproductive to your stated desires and goals.
One of the upsides to a Vivek / Elon vs a Soros is the level of transparency. This debate is taking place out in the open and putting a spotlight on this issue that it hasn't gotten before. This is inherently good for people who want to strictly clamp down on immigration; sperging and doomposting is not.