It's not my "job" to steer anyone to any particular news source, hence why I posted the picture. If you really want to know more there's plenty of information (like the perps name) for you to use your search engine of choice and read more from your news source of choice.
screenshots are easily faked and are the tools of well poisoners. this forum was founded on complaining about lack of journalistic integrity, what are we if we don't source our claims?
However you want to source your claims is up to you, but you should source them. some of my favorite methods include:
archive of article/tweet/wherever you got it
link to article/tweet/ wherever you got it. not as good as archive because it can be scrubbed, but better than nothing.
archive link/bibliography included in screenshot.
inb4
I just want to repost random jpegs that I find on the internet
in the age of the internet, jpegs and videos of faked conversations are rampant. the only way you can defend against this is if you post your sources.
telling people to just look it up is not enough, especially when the information is filtered through those search engines that you mentioned. time and time again they have shown to be biased and hide information.
stop being lazy
stop projecting. it takes 2 seconds to copy and paste a link, and you are lazy if you don't
You're telling us to quit being lazy and take responsibility when you're the one who couldn't be bothered to even link to where you got the screenshot from? It's just a courtesy dude.
It's not my "job" to steer anyone to any particular news source, hence why I posted the picture. If you really want to know more there's plenty of information (like the perps name) for you to use your search engine of choice and read more from your news source of choice.
Take some agency and responsibility for yourself.
it's your job to source your claims.
screenshots are easily faked and are the tools of well poisoners. this forum was founded on complaining about lack of journalistic integrity, what are we if we don't source our claims?
However you want to source your claims is up to you, but you should source them. some of my favorite methods include:
archive of article/tweet/wherever you got it
link to article/tweet/ wherever you got it. not as good as archive because it can be scrubbed, but better than nothing.
archive link/bibliography included in screenshot.
inb4
if that's the case, you are part of the problem
Maybe in the days of hard print. Now we have search engines, dude.
Type "Ashley McGovern" into a search engine and take your pick. It's not complicated. Quit it with the lazy excuses.
in the age of the internet, jpegs and videos of faked conversations are rampant. the only way you can defend against this is if you post your sources.
telling people to just look it up is not enough, especially when the information is filtered through those search engines that you mentioned. time and time again they have shown to be biased and hide information.
stop projecting. it takes 2 seconds to copy and paste a link, and you are lazy if you don't
I'm not asking anyone to trust me, I'm saying "Look it up for yourself."
Quit being a lazy cunt. I'm not your secretary. Look it up yourself. It's that simple, loser.
You're telling us to quit being lazy and take responsibility when you're the one who couldn't be bothered to even link to where you got the screenshot from? It's just a courtesy dude.