Fine, call it inconsistent rather than excessive then. Supposedly what he was looking at before that stunt was 4 years. Even if she was throwing the book at him the length of incarceration went up ~600-1500% once it became personal.
No retard his sentence went up 600 percent when he committed several felonies in a span of a minute including attempted murder. It's really not hard to understand
Most people, judges included, don't have the mental ability to imagine themselves in a situation. They can't understand something unless it is happening to them.
Where have you been for the past 10 years? How many violent lunatics have been released into society by soft judges? How many of those lunatics have reoffended? How many times did the dude Penny killed commit crimes before he was "made good"?
Get it together, man. That judge would have released him back into society without a second thought.
She was confronted with the reality of negrology and threw the book at him. It's obvious unless you've cut your own eyes out.
You can watch the video - she was saying why she was going to throw the book at him immediately before the attack. Appealing to statistics or bias to claim she was going to give him a slap on the wrist when you have video evidence that you are wrong is retarded.
Are you retarded mother fucker? She was literally in the midst of giving him a harsher sentence. That's why he attacked her. The average IQ on this forum is rapidly dropping
The difference between attack us, the regular public and the corrupt establishment.
Yup. He would have been out in couple years to do it all again had he not attacked the wrong person.
Literally the only time you can guarantee a female judge will apply an excessive sentence is if the crime inconvenienced her personally.
Or if it's against a person she finds icky, or is the wrong color, or any number of things that a male judge wouldn't even think of.
Lol it's not excessive and he was already about to get a long sentence
Fine, call it inconsistent rather than excessive then. Supposedly what he was looking at before that stunt was 4 years. Even if she was throwing the book at him the length of incarceration went up ~600-1500% once it became personal.
No retard his sentence went up 600 percent when he committed several felonies in a span of a minute including attempted murder. It's really not hard to understand
Most people, judges included, don't have the mental ability to imagine themselves in a situation. They can't understand something unless it is happening to them.
The judge he attacked was literally about to sentence him for a long time because he's a violent lunatic. That's why he attacked her
Where have you been for the past 10 years? How many violent lunatics have been released into society by soft judges? How many of those lunatics have reoffended? How many times did the dude Penny killed commit crimes before he was "made good"?
Get it together, man. That judge would have released him back into society without a second thought.
She was confronted with the reality of negrology and threw the book at him. It's obvious unless you've cut your own eyes out.
You can watch the video - she was saying why she was going to throw the book at him immediately before the attack. Appealing to statistics or bias to claim she was going to give him a slap on the wrist when you have video evidence that you are wrong is retarded.
Are you retarded mother fucker? She was literally in the midst of giving him a harsher sentence. That's why he attacked her. The average IQ on this forum is rapidly dropping