They REALLY underestimate women's natural desire to breed. Men have it too and have it broadcast EVERYWHERE that we basically think with our dicks but women are just as horny as men as they literally are made in a way to make and raise kids.
It's why the left made so much progress by being sexual degenerates and the right/religious made more progress promoting monogamy than abstinence. It's easier to sell people on a committed relationship than outright saying you should refuse all sex till marriage when the West made marriage into a spike pit trap for men.
but women are just as horny as men as they literally are made in a way to make and raise kids
Most guys don't know this because they are the soft, "sensitive" males who can never inspire women to be horny around them. Likely from listening to women's words instead of their actions.
Its actually quite wild just how far that idea spread. You look at TV writers, the most Jewy-Jew looking nerds around, and you know that that guy has never been able to pull women. He might have a few, but on a compromise level instead of raw sexual prowess. But he, among thousands of others, writes his experience as universal that women aren't as sexual as men and only give sex on holidays/birthdays out of obligation.
Which creates this society level belief in women not being as sexual creatures as men are and it makes all sorts of problems crop out of teaching people a very demonstrable false reality.
That's part of it, but I think there's more to it. It's not just Pedowood pushing this idea. In a society where the vast majority of people pair up in monogamous relationships (you know, a society that's functional) that lie is necessary to keep beta provider types from asking inconvenient questions like "Why am I paying this whore's bills when she obviously sees me as unworthy?". The biggest black pill I've had to swallow about society is the amount of lying and gaslighting that's necessary to keep bottom 90% SMV men engaged.
The spreading idea that women are inherently un-sexual is how betas get created in such large numbers to begin with. If you don't think women will ever exhibit sexual attraction, then you don't look for its signs or learn how to get to it.
If men learned from an early age that women are massive sluts for X Y Z, then a lot of them would change course and begin trying to exhibit those traits during puberty/early adulthood. Some would fail or not care, but a huge amount of today's betas would be at least partially successful with women if they had actually known the correct path to take before they were too far gone.
Sexual market value is still a market. There is a huge difference between a middle class of historical America, who could afford a house and family on a single salary, and a middle class today who need two incomes to barely scrape by.
In the same way, the bottom 90% SMV men wouldn't need lying and gaslighting to be kept productive and happy, because they'd be successful enough to be satisfied themselves. Not Chad Thundercock level, but enough to keep a regular man happy.
They REALLY underestimate women's natural desire to breed. Men have it too and have it broadcast EVERYWHERE that we basically think with our dicks but women are just as horny as men as they literally are made in a way to make and raise kids.
It's why the left made so much progress by being sexual degenerates and the right/religious made more progress promoting monogamy than abstinence. It's easier to sell people on a committed relationship than outright saying you should refuse all sex till marriage when the West made marriage into a spike pit trap for men.
Most guys don't know this because they are the soft, "sensitive" males who can never inspire women to be horny around them. Likely from listening to women's words instead of their actions.
Its actually quite wild just how far that idea spread. You look at TV writers, the most Jewy-Jew looking nerds around, and you know that that guy has never been able to pull women. He might have a few, but on a compromise level instead of raw sexual prowess. But he, among thousands of others, writes his experience as universal that women aren't as sexual as men and only give sex on holidays/birthdays out of obligation.
Which creates this society level belief in women not being as sexual creatures as men are and it makes all sorts of problems crop out of teaching people a very demonstrable false reality.
That's part of it, but I think there's more to it. It's not just Pedowood pushing this idea. In a society where the vast majority of people pair up in monogamous relationships (you know, a society that's functional) that lie is necessary to keep beta provider types from asking inconvenient questions like "Why am I paying this whore's bills when she obviously sees me as unworthy?". The biggest black pill I've had to swallow about society is the amount of lying and gaslighting that's necessary to keep bottom 90% SMV men engaged.
The spreading idea that women are inherently un-sexual is how betas get created in such large numbers to begin with. If you don't think women will ever exhibit sexual attraction, then you don't look for its signs or learn how to get to it.
If men learned from an early age that women are massive sluts for X Y Z, then a lot of them would change course and begin trying to exhibit those traits during puberty/early adulthood. Some would fail or not care, but a huge amount of today's betas would be at least partially successful with women if they had actually known the correct path to take before they were too far gone.
Sexual market value is still a market. There is a huge difference between a middle class of historical America, who could afford a house and family on a single salary, and a middle class today who need two incomes to barely scrape by.
In the same way, the bottom 90% SMV men wouldn't need lying and gaslighting to be kept productive and happy, because they'd be successful enough to be satisfied themselves. Not Chad Thundercock level, but enough to keep a regular man happy.
Literally just being tall is enough