Leather Apron Club, who makes great videos, released his election day message recently: if you're a conservative, don't vote. Basically it's a takedown of various boomer talking points for voting (civic duty, lesser of two evils, can't complain if you didn't vote, etc).
The problem is, the boomer talking points are not the reality of voting. The vote is an exercise of power that, while virtually meaningless on an individual level, advances group consensus.
"Voting for a candidate endorses 100% of their platform."
- This is simply wrong and frankly a naive statement. No need to elaborate on this, just look up Bush's term after he thought he won a "mandate" with his 2004 reelection.
"Voters are dumb cows who don't even know who's in power or how it's exercised."
- Largely true. Problem is, you will need a majority of those cows on your side to effect any meaningful political change. Voting for a cause orients them in a general direction.
"The Republican party keeps getting more liberal"
- While this is true on paper, if the only paper you read is campaign press releases, anyone paying the slightest attention to the Overton window since Trump became a national figure should be able to perceive that the right is actually moving farther right. The true liberal "softening" of the GOP was in the 2000s and early 2010s.
"Trump backed off on abortion"
- Trump gave you the repeal of Roe v. Wade, something I thought was unlikely in my lifetime. Any counterpoint to this is disingenuous.
"Trump supports Israel and he's in bed with the neocons"
- The only way to end the current wars is to make peace with the respective stronger party in each: Russia and Israel. Any suggestion that Trump has gone neocon is risible.
"Reading a book or volunteering or getting a government job is a better political action than voting"
- No. Beyond the stated purpose, voting is a measure of allegiance to a particular direction. It's arguably one of the most tenuous, but it galvanizes half the country into conflict with the deep state. Without conflict, there is no movement. Without awareness, nothing is possible.
People are designed to move in groups. Groups create change. Reading a book or whatever is predicated on the idea that intellectual power will be the primary lever at some point down the line, which approaches utopian thinking.
Vote. Use the tool at hand to take action.
You're always part of the system; you have one vote regardless of what you do with it.
If you don't vote then you are voting for the winner: you had the power to decrease their lead by one or two votes and you abdicated that power.
The only way you can actually be justified complaining about the system is if you vote for a write-in candidate - the "none of the above, system is broken" vote.
I'm thinking more of when they put two sh*t sandwiches before you like Obama and McCain. And whoever you vote for is an endorsement of one over the other. I don't mean when any of the candidates is remotely half-decent.
I like Nevada's system, where you can vote for 'None of the Above'. You can also spoil your ballot, and that is recorded (opponents of Nazi Germany did that in Third Reich-staged elections), but it isn't shown. Imagine if it were: Obama 40% McCain 35% Spoiled 15%. Would be great.
This post is about not voting and not voting is an endorsement of the winner. If you really wouldn't prefer one over the other then vote for none of the above or equivalent.
I agree with you that 2008 McCain was terrible and there were a lot of people who didn't vote because both were awful, but they should have voted a protest vote so like you said we could all see how many people despised both of them.
And like you also said it doesn't apply this time. Gotta get out there and vote Trump.