Whores, no contest. At the very least, they're subject to the same issues of the common man.
The most barely functional crack whore still understands the importance of personal property. Perhaps even more so than others. Compare to Seth Rogan:
You can be mad but I guess I don’t personally view my car as an extension of myself and I’ve never really felt violated any of the 15 or so times my car was broken in to. Once a guy accidentally left a cool knife in my car so if it keeps happening you might get a little treat.
It's difficult to be worse than actors. Even if journalists keep trying.
It's fake. Apparently, someone ran her pictures through some dodgy AI and then asserted that she had a porn past because the AI claimed there was 'potential similarity' between her face and that of a porn actress.
Regardless, even if she was a porn actress, Yarvin being her mentor makes me think she should have a chance at redemption. My greater objection to her is that she quit the Daily Wire because she thought that Matt Walsh was too meeeeeean to degenerates.
The original analysis compared positioning of moles on her arms and face to the porn star's along with a comparison of other facial features like the indentation under her chin and the structure of her nose and cheek bones.
She also has photos of herself from when she was around the age she allegedly did porn posted on her twitter, which was what personally was put me over the line of "it's real" since they look like the same person.
But putting that aside, what I find objectionable is that both she and Yarvin were (allegedly) doing heterodox things in 2008, yet Yarvin remains persona non grata in "respectable" institutions while she isn't. And more people on the "right" will defend a former career in porn than would defend heterodox writings on political philosophy. Richard Hanania constantly has to repudiate his past pseudonymous writings.
I can't decide which is more valuable: the opinions of actors, or the opinions of whores?
Whores, no contest. At the very least, they're subject to the same issues of the common man.
The most barely functional crack whore still understands the importance of personal property. Perhaps even more so than others. Compare to Seth Rogan:
It's difficult to be worse than actors. Even if journalists keep trying.
Chris Rufo apparently agrees with you
It's fake. Apparently, someone ran her pictures through some dodgy AI and then asserted that she had a porn past because the AI claimed there was 'potential similarity' between her face and that of a porn actress.
Regardless, even if she was a porn actress, Yarvin being her mentor makes me think she should have a chance at redemption. My greater objection to her is that she quit the Daily Wire because she thought that Matt Walsh was too meeeeeean to degenerates.
The original analysis compared positioning of moles on her arms and face to the porn star's along with a comparison of other facial features like the indentation under her chin and the structure of her nose and cheek bones.
She also has photos of herself from when she was around the age she allegedly did porn posted on her twitter, which was what personally was put me over the line of "it's real" since they look like the same person.
But putting that aside, what I find objectionable is that both she and Yarvin were (allegedly) doing heterodox things in 2008, yet Yarvin remains persona non grata in "respectable" institutions while she isn't. And more people on the "right" will defend a former career in porn than would defend heterodox writings on political philosophy. Richard Hanania constantly has to repudiate his past pseudonymous writings.
To be fair, if I were as enormous as Seth Rogan, I also wouldn't want to view anything else as an extension of myself.
Whores. They're honest with their dishonesty.
Spoiler: They are the same. Because as I will always state, Rome was right about actors.
I disagree. One is up front about sucking your cock, the other will take it up the ass but only if you get them a job.
But at the same time, they both lie for a living.
"I never said actors were cattle, I said they should be treated like cattle."
Yes, cattle are useful.
Whores, though the opinions of actors can also be valuable if you take them and then do the exact opposite.