Or rather why do people care about Hamas at all? Their activities are contained in the Middle East, they aren't the West's problem, , they are mostly israel's problem and their main goal is to get Palestinian land back , so they are mostly Palestinian nationalists. Im not sure what is the problem with that exactly. The only people who should logically have a problem with hamas are israeli shills but even they should only really blame themselves because Netenyahu admitted that he helped to fund hamas.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (127)
sorted by:
Because they're Leftist, genocidal, terrorists you stupid jew-hating faggot.
"Palestine" isn't a legitimate nation of people, it wasn't a nation before Israel either. It is a Leftist Pan-Arabist construct, no different from Black Nationalism in the US. The Palestinian Movement was constructed because Israel stopped supporting the USSR in the Cold War. That's all it is. Jordan has a better claim to the land of Israel than the "Palestinian" movement does. There is no Palestine, there is no Palestinian Nation. Show me a Jordanian Nationalist who wants to take over Israel, then we can talk about legit Nationalism.
Beyond that, they have always dedicated themselves to genocide. They engage in genocide. They explicitly support the mass murder of innocent civilians. They engage in the mass murder of civilians.
You're so blinded by your retarded jew-hatred, you literally can't see the threat that these people are to western countries, when western kids at universities are chanting "we are hamas!". Leftwing terrorism should not be given space to operate in the west.
But no no, you're right, there's no danger from Hamas. Leftwing terrorism is double-plus good now because it's killing innocent people you don't like. We gotta keep jihadist and takfirist immigration up as high as we possibly can to rape our kids and celebrate our public spaces with trucks of peace. We can fix the lame-stream media by letting Qatar run it. It's not white replacement if you convert the whites to Islam. That'll teach those dumb jooz.
You're no different from the retarded "Queers for Palestine" faggots who are stunned at the idea they won't be killed last.
“Everyone I hate is a leftist, but the people who vote 85% left wing and are wildly overrepresented in left wing movements and institutions are not.”
The problem with Muslims is that they are Muslims. But they don’t control American elections. AIPAC does.
---Gizortnik
Whites are over-represented in Leftist movements, and yet I still don't hate whites. So why would I hate jews for the same thing?
Are you sure? On either count?
Keep making shit up as you go along idiot.
The history of Hamas & the PLO has always been explicitly, ideologically, Leftist.
It is not that everyone I hate is a Leftist. It is that I hate all Leftists. Your historical ignorance of leftwing causes and movements changes nothing. Perhaps you're gonna tell me that BLM isn't a Leftist organization either?
than you must really hate the vast majority of western jews, welcome to the club adolph
I hate Leftist jews because their Leftist. Now, go sit over there faggot, we're not friends.
They're wastes of oxygen.
They can't conceive of a world that isn't hyper focused on their jew fetish, because that's all they have in their lives.
Stopped reading here.
I don't care. I'm calling a spade a spade, and I don't care that I'm required by the rules of good internet conduct to assume that someone who believes that jews are an inherent racial enemy engaged in a vast racial conspiracy dedicated to ending civilization doesn't hate jews while I'm called a foreskin munching jew by said individual.
If being called a jew hater upsets him, and he'd rather be called a sophisticated, third-positions, intellectual; he should probably stop being a jew-hating freak. It shouldn't matter, it's a statement of fact. It's like calling him a racist, his answer is yes, so why cry about it?
I never understood this talking point. The most meaningful reality of "Palestine" is that it's a bunch of Arabs who lived there for 2000 years or more, whatever they call themselves.
They haven't lived there for 2000 years. That whole narrative is just false. Jews and Muslims haven't been in a perpetual civilizational war for thousands of years. It's been a war between jewish progressives and arab progressives for a about a century. Any violence before that was just standard violence than any separate community would find living in an Islamic state.
Of the people that have lived there, some are Syrian, some are Jordanian, some are Egyptian, some are Bedoin. All moved in and out at different times. But it was never a nation of people, and it isn't one now. Palestinians are as legit of a nationality as Queers are.
The Romans kicked out the Jews in 70 AD. My point is that people other than Jews have been living there ever since, up until recent Jewish settlement.
Whether they are a homogenous people is beside the point in my eyes. They have houses, and they don't like getting kicked out of them any more than the Jews who were booted from the Second Temple.
It's not like the jews didn't live in the same general area, so did the romans, so did the arabs. I'm not talking about what version of semitic they are. These populations just haven't been perfectly static
2000 years ago the place was called Judea. Jews lived there centuries before islam was a thing.
Not when Hadrian got done with them.
Who do you think moved into the area after the Romans kicked out the Jews in 70 AD? I said 2000 years ago for a reason.
Ok buddy.
Americans aren't inherently Leftist.