95%
(media.scored.co)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
At this point I consider it important to not have inclusivity to keep the freaks away from it.
DEI excludes 95% of the population, it's the opposite of inclusivity. Catering to the masses, the lowest common denom, those icky lower and middle class people who don't even put pronouns in their bios, that's including the greatest amount of people.
I consider it important as a massive red flag for the game's quality.
By definition, inclusivity is baked into every single game already because anyone can play any game and the experience won't change depending on your immutable characteristics. The only way a game can discriminate against you is if you have a visual or physical impairment that prevents you from playing optimally, but that's hardly something developers want. And let's be honest, leftists don't give a flying fuck about actual, measurable disabilities. Instead, they work in the murky make-believe oppression morass of gender and race.
It's possible that social dynamics in multiplayer games may change depending on how you present yourself and what you say, but that's the playerbase and not the game itself. But really, if you're going to announce that you're a girl for attention and benefits, you should show your tits or gtfo.
JFC
I felt that burn from here.
It means there are a lot of replies. If those replies are "first post best post" or "kys" is ambiguous. Those numbers are links to the replying posts.
4chan is pretty based, so yeah, usually.
As shitty as concord and dustbin was at least it was brand new shitty IPs but even then the wokies refuse to support it, this shows it was never about their politics being pandered to but rather them having the power to ruin and take away your hobbies from you. Seriously fuck this people.
"players"
GAMERS.