And what makes all this sadder is that the majority of the country will still be stuck on the "picking the lesser evil" and "playing the political game" mentality. It's either "BuT soCiaLism" and our "GrEateSt AlLy" from the right or leftists screeching on about "faScisM" and "UkRaIne." Two sides of this same coin. Uniparty. One side promotes abortion while the other side remains silent so as to not lose votes, thus making that side complicit through cowardice. One side condoned the jab while the other (shocker) also condoned the jab, making both guilty of the countless that died because of it. They both support sexual degeneracy, just go over to TheDonald and see how they support Scott Presler and silence anyone who points out one shouldn't associate with degenerates. They both go on about foreign affairs (again either Ukraine or our greatest ally) instead of putting it in stone that our country will come first before anything else, and then proceed to silence anyone that points this issue out (looking at posts like this one for example: https://unscored.arete.network/c/TheDonald/p/1995LqvS4p/).

This has already been said before by many users but votes won't get us out of this situation when you consider that it isn't just the state of the government but also how immoral the country in general has become. We can go on about the uniparty working against our interests, but we must remember that half of the country actually believes in furthering degeneracy and the globohomo agenda. Have we really won when we had to appease the baby-killers, the sexual degenerates, and literally everyone else that is godless under the sun just to get elected? Consider also, as you noted, that all that effort and moral compromises would have been done just for everyone else in power (along with half of the brain-dead populace) making it a thing to sabotage any attempt to get things fixed.

Edit: Lol, this whole topic reminded me of this thread in c/christianity: https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/199OB3TlKt/50-of-christians-dont-vote-if-we/c/4ZFBMwkFuHI.

One point was whether the 50% of christians that don't vote are lukewarm and cowardly for not voting for a candidate that they don't 100% agree with. But consider this: say someone like Trump doubled down on his stances and completely condemned abortion (instead of dismissing it as a state issue) and made it his thing to return to the nation to its biblically moral roots. He for sure would have gotten more, if not all, christians to vote for him. But he didn't, because he knew doing so would have lost him the votes of everyone else in the country (again bringing up that the real issue at hand is not a question of voting but rather our immoral and subverted country). Let me ask, who is really the lukewarm one here, the person that remains unwavering in his convictions and morals, or the person that will compromise his morals so as to get ahead in the political game? There's a reason a born-again christian, or even simply a moral person, can't get ahead in the political game without making moral compromises. The political game has always been rigged in favor of the morally corrupt; plus, there are other ways to make change in the world that don't revolve on one sacrificing his morals and appeasing the godless.