it's called being an absolute retard and willfully seeing shit that isn't there.
Speaking of, reread what I initially said. I said 'so', not 'so that'. 'So 'by itself as a conjunction can have a meaning of result (regardless of intent). X happened, so y happened. There needn't have been intent, but there is a causal link. The causal link was my focus. 'So that' has the intent/purpose meaning more fully. I only said 'so', deliberately so.
Pot meet kettle, you're doing everything you accuse me of.
You're a liar. This narrative that the police officer did everything in his power to protect a terrorist at the cost of his own life, and for the expense of a german, comes mostly from right-wing memes trying to represent the dichotomy of the german state; but then people like you took it literally. Then you hyperbolized your own misconception and tried to repeat it as fact because it fits your narrative.
Don't give me this sophistic crap about what you really meant. You said what you meant the first time. If I had said anything that was wrong, you would have brought it up initially instead of crying 'how dare you call me racist!'
You came up with this new interpretation deep into this thread in a wall of text with 3 or so other grossly wrong things, mostly in messages to other people and also started going on about rape. I chose to address that lunacy first. And no, I came to the conclusion seeing what happened on livestream not memes or commentary.
If I had said anything that was wrong, you would have brought it up initially instead of crying 'how dare you call me racist!'
Also not what I said, you keep doing that.
E: But yeah, I think everyone has seen me decisively win this, and you're just intent on twisting my words. It hasn't worked. Best of luck in your future endeavours.
I called out your retarded argument from the very start and you cried that I used the word racist to describe your false assumption. Nothing's changed from the start, and you're still crying about it.
Speaking of, reread what I initially said. I said 'so', not 'so that'. 'So 'by itself as a conjunction can have a meaning of result (regardless of intent). X happened, so y happened. There needn't have been intent, but there is a causal link. The causal link was my focus. 'So that' has the intent/purpose meaning more fully. I only said 'so', deliberately so.
Pot meet kettle, you're doing everything you accuse me of.
You're a liar. This narrative that the police officer did everything in his power to protect a terrorist at the cost of his own life, and for the expense of a german, comes mostly from right-wing memes trying to represent the dichotomy of the german state; but then people like you took it literally. Then you hyperbolized your own misconception and tried to repeat it as fact because it fits your narrative.
Don't give me this sophistic crap about what you really meant. You said what you meant the first time. If I had said anything that was wrong, you would have brought it up initially instead of crying 'how dare you call me racist!'
You came up with this new interpretation deep into this thread in a wall of text with 3 or so other grossly wrong things, mostly in messages to other people and also started going on about rape. I chose to address that lunacy first. And no, I came to the conclusion seeing what happened on livestream not memes or commentary.
Also not what I said, you keep doing that.
E: But yeah, I think everyone has seen me decisively win this, and you're just intent on twisting my words. It hasn't worked. Best of luck in your future endeavours.
I called out your retarded argument from the very start and you cried that I used the word racist to describe your false assumption. Nothing's changed from the start, and you're still crying about it.