i can't recall where i read it, might even have been on this board. where someone explained that the joker was a chick-flick just with a guy inserted in the role of the woman.
Considering it involves a guy saving himself from his troubles and not a mystical prince coming to save him/her, I think its far from a chickflick.
It certainly has the misery porn aspect of most chick movies, but the way it goes about it could only happen to a man because if it was a woman people would have lost thier minds about how evil everyone is.
Instead you get people arguing that Arthur was "evil" and "creepy" for standing up for himself.
i can't recall where i read it, might even have been on this board. where someone explained that the joker was a chick-flick just with a guy inserted in the role of the woman.
Considering it involves a guy saving himself from his troubles and not a mystical prince coming to save him/her, I think its far from a chickflick.
It certainly has the misery porn aspect of most chick movies, but the way it goes about it could only happen to a man because if it was a woman people would have lost thier minds about how evil everyone is.
Instead you get people arguing that Arthur was "evil" and "creepy" for standing up for himself.