Tourettes is a literal disability, legally defined as such. Which your own words is "Exactly" what I described him having.
Which means legally speaking, by you saying he is exactly equal to someone with tourettes, he is disabled.
You rushed to downplay his disability so fast you didn't realize what you were tacitly admitting in doing so. A classic sign of someone on the backfoot trying to move a goalpost.
Literally listed as a disability legally. You can google it and get this answer if you want. Your personal opinion is meaningless.
Which means every other word you say otherwise is just cope because your point about him not being disabled is false, and you made it so by your own stupidity.
It only lacks sense because you have no ground to stand on and are desperately hopping around hoping one line will finally win you the argument to sate your ego.
Its okay, you can just stop replying and I'll forget about you quickly. Your shame won't be known.
Tourettes is a literal disability, legally defined as such. Which your own words is "Exactly" what I described him having.
Which means legally speaking, by you saying he is exactly equal to someone with tourettes, he is disabled.
You rushed to downplay his disability so fast you didn't realize what you were tacitly admitting in doing so. A classic sign of someone on the backfoot trying to move a goalpost.
Tourettes is not always a disabling condition and since I saw the movie I could see woth my.own eyes he was not disabled.
You just have a horrible liberal mindset of not taking responsibility.
You'll never convince me he was disabled because he never ever demonstrated it in the movie.
Take the L and stop assuming shit that wasn't in the movie retard.
You sound like you are still a child woth zero critical thinking. Also with pathetic world views.
Literally listed as a disability legally. You can google it and get this answer if you want. Your personal opinion is meaningless.
Which means every other word you say otherwise is just cope because your point about him not being disabled is false, and you made it so by your own stupidity.
You have trouble with reading comprehension don't you?
Your response to my quote makes no sense.
Get back to me when you can actually understand my comments kid.
L
It only lacks sense because you have no ground to stand on and are desperately hopping around hoping one line will finally win you the argument to sate your ego.
Its okay, you can just stop replying and I'll forget about you quickly. Your shame won't be known.